Factors affecting acetabular bone loss during primary hip arthroplasty -: A quantitative analysis using computer simulation

被引:7
作者
Lavigne, Martin [1 ]
Rama, Reddi Krishna Boddu Siva
Ganapathi, Muthu
Nuno, Natalia [2 ]
Winzenrieth, Renaud [2 ]
Vendittoli, Pascal-Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Surg, Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Quebec City, PQ H1T 4B3, Canada
[2] Ecole Technol Super Montreal, Dept Genie Prod Automatisee, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
hip arthroplasty; bone resection; bone loss; acetabular preparation; acetabular reaming; three-dimensional computer model;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.01.007
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Background Although, various factors may affect the degree of acetabular bone loss during primary hip arthroplasty, they have not been quantified previously. Methods. We assessed the influence of using various reamer diameters, designs and reaming depth on the amount of bone removed during acetabular preparation by simulated reaming in a three-dimensional pelvic model, using computer software. Findings. The least amount of bone loss (6185 mm(3)) providing optimal bone contact with the acetabular articular surface occurred with a 165 degrees reamer design. Increase in reamer diameter, reaming depth and subtending angle of the reamer resulted in disproportionately large increase in the amount of bone resected compared to the relatively small increase in the reamer-bone contact area. Interpretation. Surgeons must be aware of the relative influence of the reaming technique and the implant design on the amount of acetabular bone resection to optimize acetabular bone preservation during primary hip arthroplasty. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 583
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
Aspenberg P, 1998, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P75
[2]
RESORPTION OF BONE BY INFLAMMATORY CELLS DERIVED FROM THE JOINT CAPSULE OF HIP ARTHROPLASTIES [J].
ATHANASOU, NA ;
QUINN, J ;
BULSTRODE, CJK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (01) :57-62
[3]
Braud P, 1990, J Arthroplasty, V5 Suppl, pS5, DOI 10.1016/S0883-5403(08)80018-6
[4]
Radiological findings and clinical results of 102 thrust-plate femoral hip prostheses - A follow-up of 2 to 8 years [J].
Buergi, ML ;
Stoffel, KK ;
Jacob, HAC ;
Bereiter, HH .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2005, 20 (01) :108-117
[5]
Crawford JR, 2005, HIP INT, V15, P195, DOI 10.5301/HIP.2008.5286
[6]
Crites BM, 2000, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P114
[7]
Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement -: Repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation [J].
Digas, G ;
Kärrholm, J ;
Thanner, J .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2006, 77 (02) :218-226
[8]
Is removal of subchondral bone plate advantageous in cemented cup fixation? A randomized RSA study [J].
Flivik, Gunnar ;
Kristiansson, Ingvar ;
Kesteris, Uldis ;
Ryd, Leif .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (448) :164-172
[9]
Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery - A 6-to 11-year follow-up study [J].
Garcia-Cimbrelo, E .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (04) :397-406
[10]
Girard J, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V88B, P721, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6