Application of observation operators for field scale soil moisture averages and variances in agricultural landscapes

被引:24
作者
Han, Eunjin [1 ]
Heathman, Gary C. [2 ]
Merwade, Venkatesh [1 ]
Cosh, Michael H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Eros Res Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
Soil moisture; Upscaling; Cumulative distribution matching; Cedar Creek; Indiana; REMOTE-SENSING FOOTPRINTS; TEMPORAL STABILITY; PROFILE RETRIEVAL; VARIABILITY; ASSIMILATION; TIME; GEORGIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.035
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Scale difference between in situ and remotely sensed soil moisture observations and model grid size has been an issue for validation of remote sensing data, soil moisture data assimilation and calibration of hydrologic models. This study aims to link two different scales of soil moisture estimates by upscaling single point measurements to field averages for representing field-scale agricultural areas (similar to 2 ha) located within the Upper Cedar Creek Watershed in northeastern Indiana. Several statistical methods, mainly focusing on cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching, are tested to upscale point measurements to spatially representative soil moisture. These transforming equations are termed observation operators. The CDF matching is found to be the most successful upscaling method followed by the mean relative difference method using temporally stable point measurements. This study also tests the temporal and spatial (horizontal and vertical) transferability of the different observation operators. Results indicate that the two observation operators from the CDF matching approach and the mean relative difference method using a temporally stable location are transferable in space, but not in time. Rainfall characteristic is most likely the dominant factor affecting the success of observation operator transferability. In addition, the CDF matching approach is found to be an effective method to deduce spatial variability (standard deviation) of soil moisture from single point measurements. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 50
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Evaluation of the RZWQM for simulating tile drainage and leached nitrate in the Georgia piedmont [J].
Abrahamson, D. A. ;
Radcliffe, D. E. ;
Steiner, J. L. ;
Cabrera, M. L. ;
Endale, D. M. ;
Hoogenboom, G. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (03) :644-654
[2]  
Anagnostou EN, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P1590, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1590:SAOSMM>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
ATLAS D, 1990, J APPL METEOROL, V29, P1120, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<1120:CTRRRR>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Soil moisture spatial variability in experimental areas of central Italy [J].
Brocca, L. ;
Morbidelli, R. ;
Melone, F. ;
Moramarco, T. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) :356-373
[7]   Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture product [J].
Brocca, L. ;
Melone, F. ;
Moramarco, T. ;
Wagner, W. ;
Naeimi, V. ;
Bartalis, Z. ;
Hasenauer, S. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (10) :1881-1893
[8]   Catchment scale soil moisture spatial-temporal variability [J].
Brocca, L. ;
Tullo, T. ;
Melone, F. ;
Moramarco, T. ;
Morbidelli, R. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 422 :63-75
[9]   Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture and its estimation across scales [J].
Brocca, L. ;
Melone, F. ;
Moramarco, T. ;
Morbidelli, R. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
[10]   SOIL-MOISTURE VARIABILITY WITHIN REMOTE-SENSING PIXELS [J].
CHARPENTIER, MA ;
GROFFMAN, PM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D17) :18987-18995