Nerve-sparing surgery significantly affects long-term continence after radical prostatectomy

被引:59
作者
Nandipati, Kalyana C.
Raina, Rupesh
Agarwal, Ashok
Zippe, Craig D.
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Garfield Heights, OH 44125 USA
[2] St Vincents Cathol Med Ctr Brooklyn & Queens, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES In this long-term prospective study we evaluated the factors affecting urinary continence after radical prostatectomy. METHODS In this study, we recruited 156 patients (mean age, 64.1 +/- 6.7 years; follow-up, 7.8 +/- 1.3 years; prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, 9.57 +/- 8.81 ng/mL) who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 1998. Long-term data were obtained on 152 patients, with 4 patients lost to follow-Lip. Incontinence was evaluated by the number of pads per day. Follow-up data were collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months and annually. The multivariate analysis included the following variables: preoperative PSA levels, nerve-sparing (NS) status (bilateral NS, unilateral NS, and non-NS), and age at the time of operation (<= 65 or >65 years). RESULTS With a mean follow-up of 7.8 +/- 1.3 years, the overall incontinence rate was 17.7% (27 of 152). The incontinence rates were significantly higher in the non-NS group (18 of 61) compared with the bilateral NS group (6 of 66; P <0.05). No significant difference was seen between the unilateral NS and non-NS groups in terms of incontinence rates (P >0.05). When stratified by the NS status, the bilateral NS group had a significant improvement in overall continence. The association between age and incontinence was significant: P <0.05 for patients 65 years or younger (7 of 85) versus those older than 65 years (20 of 67). The association between the preoperative PSA levels and incontinence was not significant but showed a trend (the median PSA in the incontinence group was 8.75 ng/mL; in the continence group it was 5.9 ng/mL; P = 0.0534). CONCLUSIONS Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy improves the time interval to regain continence and long-term continence rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1130
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J UROL
[2]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[3]   Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Eastham, JA ;
Kattan, MW ;
Rogers, E ;
Goad, JR ;
Ohori, M ;
Boone, TB ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (05) :1707-1713
[4]  
FOOTE J, 1991, UROL CLIN N AM, V18, P229
[5]   PATIENT-REPORTED COMPLICATIONS AND FOLLOW-UP TREATMENT AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - THE NATIONAL MEDICARE EXPERIENCE - 1988-1990 (UPDATED JUNE 1993) [J].
FOWLER, FJ ;
BARRY, MJ ;
LUYAO, G ;
ROMAN, A ;
WASSON, J ;
WENNBERG, JE .
UROLOGY, 1993, 42 (06) :622-629
[6]   NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A DIFFERENT VIEW [J].
GEARY, ES ;
DENDINGER, TE ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :145-149
[7]   Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence [J].
Hollabaugh, RS ;
Dmochowski, RR ;
Kneib, TG ;
Steiner, MS .
UROLOGY, 1998, 51 (06) :960-967
[8]   Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: Results of the CaPSURE database [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Henning, JM ;
Carroll, PR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (06) :1988-1992
[9]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE OUTCOMES IN MEN FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
LITWIN, MS ;
HAYS, RD ;
FINK, A ;
GANZ, PA ;
LEAKE, B ;
LEACH, GE ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (02) :129-135
[10]   NEUROANATOMY OF THE EXTERNAL URETHRAL SPHINCTER - IMPLICATIONS FOR URINARY CONTINENCE PRESERVATION DURING RADICAL PROSTATE SURGERY [J].
NARAYAN, P ;
KONETY, B ;
ASLAM, K ;
ABOSEIF, S ;
BLUMENFELD, W ;
TANAGHO, E .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (02) :337-341