Asymmetric Social Interactions in Physician Prescription Behavior: The Role of Opinion Leaders

被引:190
作者
Nair, Harikesh S. [1 ]
Manchanda, Puneet [2 ]
Bhatia, Tulikaa [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Stephen M Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, Piscataway, NJ 08855 USA
关键词
social interactions; peer effects; social multiplier; contagion; physician prescription behavior; pharmaceutical industry; IDENTIFICATION; NETWORKS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1509/jmkr.47.5.883
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors quantify the impact of social interactions and peer effects in the context of physicians' prescription choices. Using detailed individual-level prescription data, along with self-reported social network information, the authors document that physician prescription behavior is significantly influenced by the behavior of research-active specialists, or "opinion leaders," in the physician's reference group. The authors leverage a natural experiment in the category: New guidelines released about the therapeutic nature of the focal drug generated conditions in which physicians were more likely to be influenced by the behavior of specialist physicians in their network. The authors (1) find important, statistically significant peer effects that are robust across model specifications; (2) document asymmetries in response to marketing activity across nominators and opinion leaders; (3) measure the incremental value to firms of directing targeted sales force activity to these opinion leaders; and (4) present estimates of the social multiplier of detailing in this category.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 895
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SOC DYNAMICS, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/6294.003.0005
[2]  
Becker GaryS., 2000, SOCIAL ECONOMICS
[3]   Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing [J].
Bell, David R. ;
Song, Sangyoung .
QME-QUANTITATIVE MARKETING AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 5 (04) :361-400
[4]   Network effects and welfare cultures [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Luttmer, EFP ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 115 (03) :1019-1055
[5]   Discrete choice with social interactions [J].
Brock, WA ;
Durlauf, SN .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (02) :235-260
[6]   Preventive intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections -: A field trial in the Royal Thai Army [J].
Celentano, DD ;
Bond, KC ;
Lyles, CM ;
Eiumtrakul, S ;
Go, VFL ;
Beyrer, C ;
Chiangmai, CN ;
Nelson, KE ;
Khamboonruang, C ;
Vaddhanaphuti, C .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (04) :535-540
[7]   The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years [J].
Christakis, Nicholas A. ;
Fowler, James H. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (04) :370-379
[8]  
Coleman J.S., 1966, Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study
[9]   Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana [J].
Conley, Timothy G. ;
Udry, Christopher R. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :35-69
[10]  
*CUTT EDG INF, 2004, PH64 CUTT EDG INF