Conditional Approval and Approval Under Exceptional Circumstances as Regulatory Instruments for Stimulating Responsible Drug Innovation in Europe

被引:43
作者
Boon, W. P. C. [1 ]
Moors, E. H. M. [1 ]
Meijer, A. [2 ]
Schellekens, H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Innovat Studies Grp, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Sch Governance, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Dept Innovat Studies, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
UNITED-STATES; SAFETY; ACCESS; UNION;
D O I
10.1038/clpt.2010.207
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The need for fast drug innovation and the public demand for risk-free drugs creates a dilemma for regulatory authorities: less restrictive procedures involve uncertainties about benefit/risk profiles of new drugs. The European Union has introduced two instruments that regulate early market access: conditional approvals (CAs) and approvals under exceptional circumstances (ECs). We have studied whether these instruments compromise the safety of new drugs and whether they lead to earlier access to innovative drugs. Our study shows that neither of these regulatory pathways accelerates the approval process for innovative drugs. However, the CA pathway shortens the clinical development period. Approvals under ECs are associated with longer clinical development periods, but this regulatory pathway may open up opportunities for specific drugs to be admitted into the market because less comprehensive data are required. Despite the fact that these advanced approvals are based on limited safety databases, there are no special safety issues associated with using these pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 853
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR MED AG ROAD MAP
[2]  
[Anonymous], OFF J EUR UN
[3]   Early access to new medicines [J].
Breckenridge, A. ;
Walley, T. .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 84 (01) :23-25
[4]  
Daemmrich A, 2000, Sci Cult (Lond), V9, P505, DOI 10.1080/713695270
[5]   Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma [J].
Eichler, Hans-Georg ;
Pignatti, Francesco ;
Flamion, Bruno ;
Leufkens, Hubert ;
Breckenridge, Alasdair .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2008, 7 (10) :818-826
[6]  
*EUR COMM, 2004, OFF J EUR UN
[7]   Collateral damage: the conundrum of drug safety [J].
Gale, E. A. M. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2009, 52 (10) :1975-1982
[8]   Safety-related regulatory actions for biologicals approved in the United States and the European Union [J].
Giezen, Thijs J. ;
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. ;
Straus, Sabine M. J. M. ;
Schellekens, Huub ;
Leufkens, Hubert G. M. ;
Egberts, Antoine C. G. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (16) :1887-1896
[9]   Therapeutic innovation in the European Union: analysis of the drugs approved by the EMEA between 1995 and 2003 [J].
Motola, D ;
De Ponti, F ;
Rossi, P ;
Martini, N ;
Montanaro, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 59 (04) :475-478
[10]   The risk we bear: The effects of review speed and industry user fees on new drug safety [J].
Olson, Mary K. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2008, 27 (02) :175-200