Global standards: promise and pitfalls for re-inscribing social work into civil society

被引:32
作者
Sewpaul, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Social Work & Community Dev, ZA-4041 Durban, South Africa
关键词
modernism; postmodernism; civil society; social justice; morality;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2397.2005.00361.x
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This article critiques the modernist logical-positivist ideology that has underscored social work, and interrogates the promise of the development of global standards to re-inscribe social work into civil society at the global level. The potential pitfalls and dangers of such an initiative are also examined. The development of global standards was born out of an assumption that there is a common core to social work on a global level and on an essential affirmation of humanity and human dignity of all peoples across the world. Global standards might be construed to constitute a hegemonic Western discourse and a denial of context-specific realities. However, a judicious, sensitive, post-modernist and critical approach may enhance sensitivity towards difference and a greater appreciation of locally specific realities, within the global sphere.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 217
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, ETHICAL ISSUES SOCIA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, BORDER CROSSINGS CUL, DOI DOI 10.1177/002205749217400110
  • [3] [Anonymous], BROADENING HORIZONS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2002, SOCIAL WORK
  • [5] Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
  • [6] Clarke, 1993, CRISIS CARE CHALLENG
  • [7] Dominelli L, 1996, BRIT J SOC WORK, V26, P153
  • [8] Dominelli L., 2004, SOCIAL WORK ED, V23, P515, DOI [10.1080/0261547042000252253, DOI 10.1080/0261547042000252253]
  • [9] Dominelli Lena., 2004, SOCIAL WORK THEORY P