The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms

被引:131
作者
Gigerenzer, G
机构
关键词
Bayes' theorem; bounded rationality; information format; probabilistic reasoning; satisficing; training; medical education;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9601600312
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Mind and environment evolve in tandem-almost a platitude. Much of judgment and decision making research, however, has compared cognition to standard statistical models, rather than to how well it is adapted to its environment. The author argues two points. First, cognitive algorithms are tuned to certain information formats, most likely to those that humans have encountered during their evolutionary history. In particular, Bayesian computations are simpler when the information is in a frequency format than when it is in a probability format. The author investigates whether frequency formats can make physicians reason more often the Bayesian way. Second, cognitive algorithms need to operate under constraints of limited time, knowledge, and computational power, and they need to exploit the structures of their environments. The author describes a fast and frugal algorithm, Take The Best, that violates standard principles of rational inference but can be as accurate as sophisticated ''optimal'' models for diagnostic inference.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, BULLY BRONTOSAURUS F
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, EMPIRE CHSNCE PROBAB
[3]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF LINEAR JUDGMENT MODELS [J].
BREHMER, B .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1994, 87 (2-3) :137-154
[4]  
Breiman L., 1993, CLASSIFICATION REGRE
[5]  
BRUNSWIK E, 1964, CONT APPROACHES COGN
[6]  
BURSZTAJN H, 1981, MED CHOICES MED CHAN
[7]   INTERPRETATION BY PHYSICIANS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY RESULTS [J].
CASSCELLS, W ;
SCHOENBERGER, A ;
GRABOYS, TB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (18) :999-1001
[8]   EXPERIENCE AND THE BASE-RATE FALLACY [J].
CHRISTENSENSZALANSKI, JJJ ;
BEACH, LR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1982, 29 (02) :270-278
[9]   Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty [J].
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (01) :1-73
[10]  
Dowie J., 1988, Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making