A probabilistic framework for the reference dose (probabilistic RfD)

被引:78
作者
Swartout, JC
Price, PS
Dourson, ML
Carlson-Lynch, HL
Keenan, RE
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Ctr Environm Assessment, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[2] McLaren Hart ChemRisk, Portland, ME 04102 USA
[3] Toxicol Excellence Risk Assessment, Cincinnati, OH 45223 USA
关键词
probabilstic; uncertainty factor; distribution; reference dose; hazard quotient;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01294.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Determining the probabilistic limits for the uncertainty factors used in the derivation of the Reference Dose (RfD) is an important step toward the goal of characterizing the risk of noncarcinogenic effects from exposure to environmental pollutants. If uncertainty factors are seen, individually, as "upper bounds" on the dose-scaling factor for sources of uncertainty, then determining comparable upper bounds for combinations of uncertainty factors can be accomplished by treating uncertainty factors as distributions, which can be combined by probabilistic techniques. This paper presents a conceptual approach to probabilistic uncertainty factors based on the definition and use of RfDs by the U.S. EPA. The approach does not attempt to distinguish one uncertainty factor from another based on empirical data or biological mechanisms but rather uses a simple displaced lognormal distribution as a generic representation of all uncertainty factors. Monte Carlo analyses show that the upper bounds for combinations of this distribution can vary by factors of two to four when compared to the fixed-value uncertainty factor approach. The probabilistic approach is demonstrated in the comparison of Hazard Quotients based on RfDs with differing number of uncertainty factors.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aitchison J., 1966, The Lognormal Distribution
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, SCI JUDGM RISK ASS
[3]   Noncancer risk assessment: A probabilistic alternative to current practice [J].
Baird, SJS ;
Cohen, JT ;
Graham, JD ;
Shlyakhter, AI ;
Evans, JS .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (01) :79-102
[4]   REFERENCE DOSE (RFD) - DESCRIPTION AND USE IN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS [J].
BARNES, DG ;
DOURSON, M .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 8 (04) :471-486
[5]   STATISTICAL UNCERTAINTY IN THE NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL [J].
BROWN, KG ;
ERDREICH, LS .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 13 (02) :235-244
[6]   IMPROVED METHOD FOR SELECTION OF THE NOAEL [J].
CALABRESE, EJ ;
BALDWIN, LA .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 19 (01) :48-50
[7]   UNCERTAINTY FACTORS AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIATION [J].
CALABRESE, EJ .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) :190-196
[8]   ANIMAL EXTRAPOLATION - A LOOK INSIDE THE TOXICOLOGISTS BLACK-BOX [J].
CALABRESE, EJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 21 (07) :618-623
[9]   LACK OF TOTAL INDEPENDENCE OF UNCERTAINTY FACTORS (UFS) - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SIZE OF THE TOTAL UNCERTAINTY FACTOR [J].
CALABRESE, EJ ;
GILBERT, CE .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 17 (01) :44-51
[10]   A NEW METHOD FOR DETERMINING ALLOWABLE DAILY INTAKES [J].
CRUMP, KS .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1984, 4 (05) :854-871