Realism and comprehension in economics: A footnote to an exchange between Oliver E.!Williamson and Herbert A.!Simon

被引:10
作者
Augier, Mie [1 ]
March, James G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
bounded rationality; behavioral economics; intellectual history; trade-offs; Sinfulness; Herbert Simon; Oliver Williamson;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2007.05.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The correspondence between Herbert Simon and Oliver Williamson reveals a history of disagreement ultimately resolved by a reinstatement of mutual respect and agreement. On the surface, the disagreements concern questions about the appropriate trade-offs between realism and comprehension in economic theory, on the extent to which the theory should be based on realistic behavioral assumptions. At another level, however, the disagreements expose a different issue: Whether the sacrifices of realism involved in seeking comprehensible theory are to be experienced as unfortunate but necessary costs or as agonizing falls from grace that may be forgiven but only if accompanied with pain and contrition. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 105
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1956, The Rebel
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, The Mechanisms of Governance
  • [3] THE ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS OF CAPITALISM - WILLIAMSON
    BAUMOL, WJ
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [4] Berlin I, 1953, The hedgehog and the fox
  • [5] BLOMQUIST G, 2001, INT ENCY SOCIAL BEHA, V24, P16132
  • [6] Dahl R.A., 1953, POLITICS EC WELFARE
  • [7] MARCH J, 1992, J SOCIO-ECON, V21, P261, DOI DOI 10.1016/1053-5357(92)90013-W
  • [8] Marshall A., 1961, PRINCIPLES EC
  • [9] MILLER GA, 2004, MODELS MAN ESSAYS HO, P481
  • [10] SAMUELSON PA, 2004, MODELS MAN ESSAYS ME, P153