Characterization and comparison of a membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated-sludge system in the treatment of wastewater containing high-molecular-weight compounds

被引:127
作者
Çiçek, N [1 ]
Franco, JP [1 ]
Suidan, MT [1 ]
Urbain, V [1 ]
Manem, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
membrane bioreactor; activated sludge; metabolic activity; enzymatic activity; sludge production; treatment efficiency;
D O I
10.2175/106143099X121481
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The performance and characteristics of a membrane bioreactor (MBR) and a conventional activated-sludge system (AS) fed wastewater containing casein and starch were compared. Except different solids retention times (20 days for AS, 30 days for MBR), the systems were operated under identical conditions. Approximately 99.0% chemical oxygen demand and 96.9% dissolved organic carbon removal were achieved in the MBR compared to 94.5 and 92.7% in the AS. Both systems showed effective nitrification and phosphorus utilization. The MBR sludge was composed of small Aocs; free swimming bacteria; and a small number of filamentous organisms, nematodes, and ciliates. The AS sludge was composed of larger flocs and higher amounts of filamentous organism and nematodes. The biomass in the MBR had a higher viable fraction than the AS. Enzymatic activity tests showed that (1) overall activity was consistently higher in the MBR, (2) both systems produced enzymes specific for the degradation of feed chemicals, (3) no enzymes were detected in the MBR effluent compared to significant amounts in the AS, and (4) the MBR contained more enzymes in the soluble phase than the AS. Particle size distribution tests verified that the AS sludge contained large flocs, while the MBR sludge contained primarily small flocs. The specific resistance of the MBR sludge was three orders of magnitude higher than the AS. The AS sludge showed better settleability than the MBR.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WATER TREATMENT MEMB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[3]   CHARACTERIZATION OF ENZYME-ACTIVITY IN ACTIVATED-SLUDGE USING RAPID ANALYSES FOR SPECIFIC HYDROLASES [J].
BOCZAR, BA ;
BEGLEY, WM ;
LARSON, RJ .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 1992, 64 (06) :792-797
[4]   HOUSEHOLD MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR IN DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER TREATMENT [J].
CHIEMCHAISRI, C ;
YAMAMOTO, K ;
VIGNESWARAN, S .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (01) :171-178
[5]  
DUFRESNE R, 1996, P 82 ANN M TECH SECT, pB1
[6]  
FAN X, 1996, UNPUB INT ASS WAT QU
[7]   EFFICACY OF PHOSPHOLIPID ANALYSIS IN DETERMINING MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SEDIMENTS [J].
FINDLAY, RH ;
KING, GM ;
WATLING, L .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 55 (11) :2888-2893
[8]   FLUORESCEIN DIACETATE HYDROLYSIS AS A MEASURE OF MICROBIAL ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SYSTEMS - APPLICATION TO ACTIVATED SLUDGES [J].
FONTVIEILLE, DA ;
OUTAGUEROUINE, A ;
THEVENOT, DR .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1992, 13 (06) :531-540
[9]   Community analysis by Biolog: Curve integration for statistical analysis of activated sludge microbial habitats [J].
Guckert, JB ;
Carr, GJ ;
Johnson, TD ;
Hamm, BG ;
Davidson, DH ;
Kumagai, Y .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1996, 27 (2-3) :183-197
[10]  
Hasbach A, 1996, POLLUT ENG, V28, P45