An experimental study on residual lithiasis after shock wave lithotripsy

被引:14
作者
Costa-Bauzá, A [1 ]
Perelló, J [1 ]
Isern, B [1 ]
Grases, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Balearic Isl, Inst Hlth Sci Res IUNICS, Lab Renal Lithiasis Res, Palma de Mallorca 07122, Spain
来源
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH | 2005年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
crystal regrowth; shock wave lithotripsy; calcium oxalate monohydrate; crystallization inhibitor; phytate;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-004-0443-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The main objective of this paper was to study residual lithiasis after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (post-ESWL), with the aim of contributing to the development of effective prophylactic measures. In vivo regrown calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) post-ESWL residual fragments were studied by stereoscopic microscopy, infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy with an energy dispersive X-ray analyzer. An in vitro system was also used to study the regrowth of post-ESWL fragments of COM calculi. The regrowth was evaluated as the relative increase in the weight of the fragments. The effects of a calcium oxalate crystallization inhibitor (phytate) were also evaluated. All of the in vivo regrown COM real residual post-ESWL fragments exhibited practically the same internal structural features. The in vitro studies demonstrated that the regrowth of post-ESWL residual fragments, in the absence of crystallization inhibitors, occurred even using normocalciuric/normooxaluric urine and could be detected at 24 h. At 144-240 h, the formation of new COM columnar zones was observed. The presence of 1.5 mg/l of phytate totally blocked the growth process. When hypercalciuric/normooxaluric urine was used, significant amounts of disorganized calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) crystals were formed. The in vitro regrowth of post-ESWL COM fragments was clearly influenced by the presence of crystallization inhibitors. These data also demonstrate the importance that effective prophylactic therapies could exert on preventing recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
BARON AR, 2001, ARCH ESP UROL, V54, P1009
[2]   New stone formation: A comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Carr, LK ;
Honey, RJD ;
Jewett, MAS ;
Ibanez, D ;
Ryan, M ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (05) :1565-1567
[3]   Citrate inhibits growth of residual fragments in an in vitro model of calcium oxalate renal stones [J].
Chow, K ;
Dixon, J ;
Gilpin, S ;
Kavanagh, JP ;
Rao, PN .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 65 (05) :1724-1730
[4]   Management of residual stones [J].
Delvecchio, FC ;
Preminger, GM .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 27 (02) :347-+
[5]   REPORT OF THE UNITED-STATES COOPERATIVE STUDY OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY [J].
DRACH, GW ;
DRETLER, S ;
FAIR, W ;
FINLAYSON, B ;
GILLENWATER, J ;
GRIFFITH, D ;
LINGEMAN, J ;
NEWMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (06) :1127-1133
[6]   Simple classification of renal calculi closely related to their micromorphology and etiology [J].
Grases, F ;
Costa-Bauzá, A ;
Ramis, M ;
Montesinos, V ;
Conte, A .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 322 (1-2) :29-36
[7]   Absorption and excretion of orally administered inositol hexaphosphate (IP6 or phytate) in humans [J].
Grases, F ;
Simonet, BM ;
Vucenik, I ;
Prieto, RM ;
Costa-Bauzá, A ;
March, JG ;
Shamsuddin, AM .
BIOFACTORS, 2001, 15 (01) :53-61
[8]   Biopathological crystallization: a general view about the mechanisms of renal stone formation [J].
Grases, F ;
Costa-Bauza, A ;
Garcia-Ferragut, L .
ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1998, 74 :169-194
[9]   Urinary phytate in calcium oxalate stone formers and healthy people -: Dietary effects on phytate excretion [J].
Grases, F ;
March, JG ;
Prieto, RM ;
Simonet, BM ;
Costa-Bauzá, A ;
García-Raja, A ;
Conte, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2000, 34 (03) :162-164
[10]   Long-term stone recurrence rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy [J].
Kamihira, O ;
Ono, Y ;
Katoh, N ;
Yamada, S ;
Mizutani, K ;
Ohshima, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (04) :1267-1271