Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty 11-year experience from 3929 implants in RIPO register

被引:16
作者
Bordini, Barbara [1 ]
Stea, Susanna [1 ]
Falcioni, Stefano [1 ]
Ancarani, Cristina [1 ]
Toni, Aldo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Med Technol Lab, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[2] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Dept Orthopaed Traumatol & Prosthet Surg & Revis, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Unicompartmental knee prosthesis; Register; Epidemiology; Failure; FOLLOW-UP;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: Since 2000, the Register of Prosthetic Orthopedic Implants (RIPO) has been following all hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties in the Emilia-Romagna region, comprising 4.5 million inhabitants, in northern Italy. The aim of the present analysis was to present the main figures of unicompartmental knee implants processed from the Registry. Methods: During the period 2000-2011, 3929 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were performed on 3645 resident patients, of which 71% were females. The medial condyle was treated in 94% of cases, where mean age at surgery was 673 years and mean body weight was 76.6 kg. The main outcome measure was time to revision of at least one single component. The Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox multivariate analyses have been applied. Results: At 10-year follow-up, the percentage of survival was 86.8% (confidence interval (CI) at 95% was 84.1-89.5); total aseptic loosening represented 42% of the causes of failure, pain represented 15%, and sepsis represented 11%. Age at surgery significantly influences the survival of the prosthesis, whatever the reason for revision, while the type of tibial component (monoblock or metal tray) does not appear to be a determinant. Septic failure is not prevented by the use of antibiotic-loaded cement. Conclusion: Results are comparable to main orthopedic registries from Scandinavia, Australia, and New Zealand, even if some differences can be highlighted. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1279
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
Australian Orthopaedic Association, National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report
[2]
Davidson D, 2012, RESULTS UKR REVISION, P42
[3]
Gooley TA, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P695, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.3.CO
[4]
2-F
[5]
Risk Factors for Infection After Knee Arthroplasty A Register-Based Analysis of 43,149 Cases [J].
Jamsen, Esa ;
Huhtala, Heini ;
Puolakka, Timo ;
Moilanen, Teemu .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (01) :38-47
[6]
Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis - A follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register [J].
Koskinen, Esa ;
Eskelinen, Antti ;
Paavolainen, Pekka ;
Pulkkinen, Pekka ;
Remes, Ville .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2008, 79 (04) :499-507
[7]
Is Recovery Faster for Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental than Total Knee Arthroplasty? [J].
Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr. ;
Berend, Keith R. ;
Walter, Christopher A. ;
Aziz-Jacobo, Jorge ;
Cheney, Nicholas A. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (06) :1450-1457
[8]
Unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty Database Analysis: Is There a Winner? [J].
Lyons, Matthew C. ;
MacDonald, Steven J. ;
Somerville, Lyndsay E. ;
Naudie, Douglas D. ;
McCalden, Richard W. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (01) :84-90
[9]
National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 9 ANN REP 2012
[10]
Knee arthroplasty in Denmark, Norway and Sweden A pilot study from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association [J].
Robertsson, Otto ;
Bizjajeva, Svetlana ;
Fenstad, Anne Marie ;
Furnes, Ove ;
Lidgren, Lars ;
Mehnert, Frank ;
Odgaard, Anders ;
Pedersen, Alma Becic ;
Havelin, Leif Ivar .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2010, 81 (01) :82-89