Long-term hydrologic simulation using SCS-CN-based improved soil moisture accounting procedure

被引:36
作者
Durbude, Dilip G. [2 ]
Jain, Manoj K. [1 ]
Mishra, Surendra K.
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Hydrol, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Natl Inst Hydrol, Dept Environm Hydrol, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
long-term hydrologic simulation models; stream flow; soil moisture accounting procedure; run-off; initial soil moisture level; curve number; antecedent moisture condition; SURFACE RUNOFF; MODEL; VALIDATION; STREAMFLOW; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.7789
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method is widely used in determination of direct surface run-off in long-term (continuous) hydrologic simulation models. Of late, Michel et al. (2005) reviewed the soil moisture accounting (SMA) procedure that lies behind the original SCS-CN method and pointed out severe structural inconsistencies in the treatment of antecedent condition and, in turn, proposed a sounder methodology. However, this method still needs refinement in the definition of initial moisture level (V-0) to make it usable in field. Thus, in the present study, the Michel et al. (2005) model is modified to avoid the unrealistic sudden jump in V-0 by incorporating conceptual SMA procedure and variation of daily CN based on antecedent moisture amount instead of antecedent moisture condition. When applied to 17 watersheds from different agro-climatic regions of India, the proposed model simulates daily stream flows better than those due to Michel et al. model. The proposed model performed better in high run-off producing (wet) watersheds than in low run-off producing (dry) watersheds, and the base flow was more and less significant in high and low run-off producing watersheds, respectively, whereas the evapotranspiration showed a reverse trend. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 579
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, EPA600R94168B
[2]  
[Anonymous], HYDR HDB MAN REP ENG
[3]  
Arnold J.G., 1990, SWRRB - A Basin-Scale Simulation Model for Soil and Water Resources Management, P255
[4]   SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Fohrer, N .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (03) :563-572
[5]   A COMPREHENSIVE SURFACE-GROUNDWATER FLOW MODEL [J].
ARNOLD, JG ;
ALLEN, PM ;
BERNHARDT, G .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1993, 142 (1-4) :47-69
[6]  
BOUGHTON W C, 1968, Journal of Hydrology (Wellington North), V7, P75
[7]  
Carsel R., 1997, PRZM 3 1 USERS MANUA
[8]   Daily streamflow modelling and assessment based on the curve-number technique [J].
Choi, JY ;
Engel, BA ;
Chung, HW .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (16) :3131-3150
[9]  
Donigian A. S. Jr., 1983, Agricultural management and water quality, P200
[10]   Comparison of models for computing drainage discharge [J].
El-Sadek, A ;
Feyen, J ;
Berlamont, J .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2001, 127 (06) :363-369