Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites

被引:149
作者
Badarudeen, Sameer [1 ]
Sabharwal, Sanjeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.G.00347
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: While experts recommend that the readability of patient education materials should be less than the sixth grade level, the available information pertaining to orthopaedic diseases may be excessively complex for some to read and comprehend. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level is the most widely used tool to evaluate the readability score of a given text, with a lower grade level suggesting easier readability. The goal of our study was to assess the readability of pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials that were developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) and were accessible to the general public through the Internet. Materials and Methods: All articles from the "Children" section of the patient education library, "Your Orthopaedic Connection," on the AAOS web site and the "Parent/Patient" section on the POSNA web site were identified. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level of each article was determined with use of Microsoft Office Word software. The mean grade levels of articles that were available in 2001 were compared with those accessible in 2007. Results: Fifty-seven unique articles were available in 2007 on both web sites compared with twenty-five articles available in 2001. The readability score of only one (2%) of the currently available articles was less than sixth grade level. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level of the currently available articles was 8.9 compared with 8.7 for the articles available in 2001 (p = 0.71). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that most of the pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials available on the AAOS and POSNA web sites have readability scores that may be too high, making comprehension difficult for a substantial portion of the United States population.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice [J].
Albright, J ;
deGuzman, C ;
Acebo, P ;
Paiva, D ;
Faulkner, M ;
Swanson, J .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1996, 9 (03) :139-143
[2]
Readability of published rental educational materials [J].
Alexander, RE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 131 (07) :937-942
[3]
[Anonymous], 2005, Statistical methods for health care research
[4]
[Anonymous], 1999, SCI TECHN INF SIMPL
[5]
[Anonymous], 2006, HLTH LIT AM ADULTS R
[6]
Evaluation of internet use by paediatric orthopaedic outpatients and the quality of information available [J].
Aslam, N ;
Bowyer, D ;
Wainwright, A ;
Theologis, T ;
Benson, M .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2005, 14 (02) :129-133
[7]
The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services [J].
Baker, DW ;
Parker, RM ;
Williams, MV ;
Clark, WS ;
Nurss, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (06) :1027-1030
[8]
Health Literacy Implications for Teaching the Adult Patient [J].
Bass, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF INFUSION NURSING, 2005, 28 (01) :15-22
[9]
Beall McPherson S 3rd, 2002, Iowa Orthop J, V22, P103
[10]
Use of the Internet by pediatric orthopaedic outpatients [J].
Beall, MS ;
Golladay, GJ ;
Greenfield, MLVH ;
Hensinger, RN ;
Biermann, JS .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2002, 22 (02) :261-264