Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia: Not all it seems?

被引:42
作者
Kipps, C. M.
Nestor, P. J.
Fryer, T. D.
Hodges, J. R.
机构
[1] MRC Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Clin Neurosci, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
[4] Addenbrookes Hosp, Wolfson Brain Imaging Unit, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
frontotemporal dementia; longitudinal progression; MRI; positron emission tomography; phenocopy;
D O I
10.1080/13554790701594870
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The diagnosis of the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) can be challenging. At present there is a paucity of prospective work addressing the specificity of current diagnostic criteria for bvFTD with respect to long-term outcome (i.e., false positives versus true positives). Methods: Here we report two individuals who met current clinical criteria for bvFTD and who underwent detailed long-term clinical and neuropsychological follow-up. In addition, both had serial volumetric MRI and functional metabolic (FDG-PET) imaging separated by 5 years. Results: One case had a slow clinical decline as well as both progressive atrophy and hypometabolism in a frontotemporal distribution, consistent with a neurodegenerative FTD syndrome. However, the second developed neither atrophy nor hypometabolism and remained clinically stable, a decade from symptom onset. Conclusion: We propose that these cases illustrate that while there may be a slow evolution in bvFTD, it is possible that some cases who meet current criteria may not have a neurodegenerative syndrome. If correct, this hypothesis has important implications for the current diagnostic criteria. A potential hierarchy for diagnostic certainty in bvFTD is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 247
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HALSTEAD REITAN NEUR
[3]   Staging disease severity in pathologically confirmed cases of frontotemporal dementia [J].
Broe, M ;
Hodges, JR ;
Schofield, E ;
Shepherd, CE ;
Kril, JJ ;
Halliday, GM .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 60 (06) :1005-1011
[4]  
BRUN A, 1994, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V57, P416
[5]   Progression in frontotemporal dementia - Identifying a benign Behavioral variant by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Davies, Rhys R. ;
Kipps, Christopher M. ;
Mitchell, Joanna ;
Kril, Jillian J. ;
Halliday, Glenda M. ;
Hodges, John R. .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 63 (11) :1627-1631
[6]   FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian disorders [J].
Eckert, T ;
Barnes, A ;
Dhawan, V ;
Frucht, S ;
Gordon, MF ;
Feigin, AS ;
Eidelberg, D .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :912-921
[7]  
Feigin A, 2001, J NUCL MED, V42, P1591
[8]   Frontotemporal dementia: Clinicopathological correlations [J].
Forman, Mark S. ;
Farmer, Jennifer ;
Johnson, Julene K. ;
Clark, Christopher M. ;
Arnold, Steven E. ;
Coslett, H. Branch ;
Chatterjee, Anjan ;
Hurtig, Howard I. ;
Karlawish, Jason H. ;
Rosen, Howard J. ;
Van Deerlin, Vivianna ;
Lee, Virginia M. -Y. ;
Miller, Bruce L. ;
Trojanowski, John Q. ;
Grossman, Murray .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 59 (06) :952-962
[9]  
Gregory CA, 1999, NEUROPSY NEUROPSY BE, V12, P128
[10]   CLINICAL PICTURE OF FRONTAL-LOBE DEGENERATION OF NON-ALZHEIMER TYPE [J].
GUSTAFSON, L .
DEMENTIA, 1993, 4 (3-4) :143-148