Chemical Shift-Based Water/Fat Separation: A Comparison of Signal Models

被引:124
作者
Hernando, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Liang, Zhi-Pei [1 ,2 ]
Kellman, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Beckman Inst Adv Sci & Technol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] NHLBI, Cardiac Energet Lab, NIH, Dept Hlth & Human Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
fat-water imaging; fat quantification; Dixon imaging; multi-peak fat; T-2* measurement; FIELD MAP ESTIMATION; FAT QUANTIFICATION; DIXON TECHNIQUE; PROTON MR; IN-VIVO; 3.0; T; RECONSTRUCTION; DECOMPOSITION; T-1;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.22455
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Quantitative water/fat separation in MRI requires careful modeling of the acquired signal. Multiple signal models have been proposed in recent years, but their relative performance has not yet been established. This article presents a comparative study of 12 signal models for quantitative water/fat separation. These models were selected according to three main criteria: magnitude or complex fitting, use of single-peak or multipeak fat spectrum, and modeling of T-2* decay. The models were compared based on an analysis of the bias and standard deviation of their resulting estimates. Results from theoretical analysis, simulation, phantom experiments, and in vivo data were in good agreement. These results show that (a) complex fitting is uniformly superior to magnitude fitting, (b) multipeak fat modeling is able to remove the bias present in single-peak fat modeling, and (c) a single-T-2* model performs best over a range of clinically relevant signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and water/fat ratios. Magn Reson Med 64:811-822, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 822
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Comparison of fat quantification methods: A phantom study at 3.0T [J].
Bernard, Clare P. ;
Liney, Gary P. ;
Manton, David J. ;
Turnbull, Lindsay W. ;
Langton, Christian M. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (01) :192-197
[2]
Bernstein MA., 2004, Handbook of MRI pulse sequences, P1017
[3]
Role of proton MR for the study of muscle lipid metabolism [J].
Boesch, Chris ;
Machann, Juergen ;
Vermathen, Peter ;
Schick, Fritz .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2006, 19 (07) :968-988
[4]
Relaxation effects in the quantification of fat using gradient echo imaging [J].
Bydder, Mark ;
Yokoo, Takeshi ;
Hamilton, Gavin ;
Middleton, Michael S. ;
Chavez, Alyssa D. ;
Schwimmer, Jeffrey B. ;
Lavine, Joel E. ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (03) :347-359
[5]
Chebrolu VV., 2009, Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of ISMRM, P2847
[6]
MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: Preliminary results [J].
de Bazelaire, CMJ ;
Duhamel, GD ;
Rofsky, NM ;
Alsop, DC .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :652-659
[7]
MULTIPOINT DIXON TECHNIQUE FOR WATER AND FAT PROTON AND SUSCEPTIBILITY IMAGING [J].
GLOVER, GH .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1991, 1 (05) :521-530
[8]
3-POINT DIXON TECHNIQUE FOR TRUE WATER FAT DECOMPOSITION WITH BO INHOMOGENEITY CORRECTION [J].
GLOVER, GH ;
SCHNEIDER, E .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 18 (02) :371-383
[9]
HAACKE EM, 1999, MAGNETIC RESONANCE I, P913
[10]
Joint estimation of water/fat images and field inhomogeneity map [J].
Hernando, D. ;
Haldar, J. P. ;
Sutton, B. P. ;
Ma, J. ;
Kellman, P. ;
Liang, Z. -P. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2008, 59 (03) :571-580