Early cognitive change in the general population: How do different definitions work?

被引:86
作者
Stephan, Blossom C. M.
Matthews, Fiona E.
McKeith, Ian G.
Bond, John
Brayne, Carol
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB2 0SR, England
[2] Inst Publ Hlth, MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
[3] Newcastle Gen Hosp, Wolfson Res Ctr, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 6BE, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
mild cognitive impairment; dementia; population prevalence;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01386.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: To explore the application of existing classifications of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and associated states in a large population sample. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study, baseline phase (cross-sectional analysis). SETTING: Large-scale multicenter study in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen thousand four individuals aged 65 and older from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study. From this, a subsample of 2,640 individuals was selected and completed a more-detailed cognitive assessment. MEASUREMENTS: Information on sociodemographic status, general health, cognitive impairment (measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination), and functional ability was collected in a structured interview at baseline. The Geriatric Mental State Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer-Assisted Taxonomy and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination were used in assessment to determine cognitive status. Using a systematic literature review to collect all symptom classifications for nonnormal dementia states, these were then operationalized retrospectively. Each participant was classified according to each. RESULTS: Population prevalence estimates were variable (range 0.1-42%), reflecting differences in the focus and content of each state. Limited overlap existed between states such that many individuals were concurrently classified as normal and impaired. This highlights the heterogeneity in classification as captured using different definitions. CONCLUSION: Classification of cognitively impaired and cognitively normal individuals is dependent on the way criteria are defined and operationalized. Each classification captures a unique group of individuals, with little concordance. Given the importance of early detection of dementia and the calls for screening, and recruitment into pharmacological trials of cognitively impaired individuals, there is an urgent need for an agreed-upon standard MCI case definition to use as a criterion standard.
引用
收藏
页码:1534 / 1540
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU
[3]   CRITERIA FOR DIAGNOSING AGE-ASSOCIATED MEMORY IMPAIRMENT - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE FIELD [J].
BLACKFORD, RC ;
LARUE, A .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 5 (04) :295-306
[4]  
BOND J, 1982, SCOTTISH HOME HLTH S, V42
[5]  
Brayne C, 1998, PSYCHOL MED, V28, P319
[6]   Mild cognitive impairment [J].
Chertkow, H .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 15 (04) :401-407
[7]   An analysis of systems of classifying mild cognitive impairment in older people [J].
Collie, A ;
Maruff, P .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 36 (01) :133-140
[8]   A COMPUTERIZED PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM AND CASE NOMENCLATURE FOR ELDERLY SUBJECTS - GMS AND AGECAT [J].
COPELAND, JRM ;
DEWEY, ME ;
GRIFFITHSJONES, HM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1986, 16 (01) :89-99
[9]   Age-Associated Memory Impairment: Proposed Diagnostic Criteria and Measures of Clinical Change - Report of a National Institute of Mental Health Work Group [J].
Crook, Thomas ;
Bartus, Raymond T. ;
Ferris, Steven H. ;
Whitehouse, Peter ;
Cohen, Gene D. ;
Gershon, Samuel .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 2 (04) :261-276
[10]   Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence, prognosis, aetiology, and treatment [J].
DeCarli, C .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2003, 2 (01) :15-21