Measurement of heparin concentration in whole blood with the Hepcon/HMS device does not agree with laboratory determination of plasma heparin concentration using a chromogenic substrate for activated factor X

Measurement of circulating heparin concentration has been suggested to optimize anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. The Hepcon/HMS device (Medtronic HemoTec, Inc., Parker, Colo.) uses heparin/protamine titration to quantitatively determine heparin concentration. Extensive validation of this instrument is still lacking. Methods: Agreement between heparin concentrations measured by the Hepcon/HMS system and by laboratory determination was evaluated in 16 patients undergoing cardiac operations. For laboratory determinants, plasma heparin concentration was derived from the measure of anti-Xa activity by means of a chromogenic substrate technique. The Hepcon/HMS instrument and cartridges measured whole blood heparin concentration. Samples were analyzed 5 minutes after administration of heparin, 15 and 30 minutes after the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, 5 minutes after aortic unclamping, at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and after administration of protamine. Data were plotted and interpreted according to the method of Bland and Altman: First, a difference less than 1.4 U/ml (i.e., +/-0.7 U/ml) was chosen as acceptable, because it would not cause major difficulties in clinical interpretation, because it would not cause major difficulties in clinical interpretation; second, the difference between the two measurement techniques was plotted against the mean of the two measures. Results: The mean difference (bias) between heparin concentrations derived by the Hepcon/HMS device and those obtained by laboratory determination was as expected for measures performed on whole blood versus plasma (1.45 U/ml). Nevertheless, heparin concentrations derived by the Hepcon/HMS device may be as much as 2.76 U/ml above or 6.17 U/ml below the concentrations measured in the laboratory, differences well outside the predetermined limits of agreement and clearly unacceptable for clinical purposes. Conclusion: We conclude that heparin concentrations determined with the Hepcon/HMS instrument do not agree with laboratory determination of heparin concentration. Monitoring of heparin concentrations during bypass with the Hepcon/HMS device cannot be recommended.