Reducing hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation

被引:101
作者
Constantoyannis, C
Berk, C
Honey, CR
Mendez, I
Brownstone, RM
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Div Neurosurg, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E5, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Div Neurosurg, Halifax, NS, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0317167100003966
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is used increasingly worldwide for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor and pain. As with any implanted system, however, DBS introduces a new series of problems related to its hardware. Infection, malfunction and lead migration or fracture may increase patient morbidity and should be considered when evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of this therapy. This work highlights several factors felt to increase DBS hardware complications. Methods: The authors undertook a prospective analysis of their patients receiving this therapy in two Canadian centres, over a four-year period. Results: One hundred and forty-four patients received 204 permanent electrode implants. The average follow-up duration was 24 months. Complications related to the DBS hardware were seen in 11 patients (7.6%). There were two lead fractures (1.4%) and nine infections (6.2%) including two erosions (1.4%). There was a significantly greater risk of infection in patients who underwent staged procedures with externalization. In patients with straight scalp incisions, the rate of infection was higher than that seen with curved incisions. Conclusion: Hardware complications were not common. A period of externalization of the electrodes for a stimulation trial was associated with an increased infection rate. It is also possible that a straight scalp incision instead of curvilinear incision may lead to an increase in the rate of infection. With a clear understanding of the accepted DBS device indications and their potential complications, patients may make a truly informed decision about DBS technology.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 200
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders [J].
Benabid, AL ;
Pollak, P ;
Gao, DM ;
Hoffmann, D ;
Limousin, P ;
Gay, E ;
Payen, I ;
Benazzouz, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (02) :203-214
[2]   LONG-TERM SUPPRESSION OF TREMOR BY CHRONIC STIMULATION OF THE VENTRAL INTERMEDIATE THALAMIC NUCLEUS [J].
BENABID, AL ;
POLLAK, P ;
GERVASON, C ;
HOFFMANN, D ;
GAO, DM ;
HOMMEL, M ;
PERRET, JE ;
DEROUGEMONT, J .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8738) :403-406
[3]  
Benabid AL, 2000, PROG NEUROL SURG, V15, P196
[4]  
BENDOK B, 1998, TXB STEREOTACTIC FUN, P01539
[5]   Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery [J].
Beric, A ;
Kelly, PJ ;
Rezai, A ;
Sterio, D ;
Mogilner, A ;
Zonenshayn, M ;
Kopell, B .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 77 (1-4) :73-78
[6]  
DIROCCO C, 1987, TREATMENT INFANTILE, P79
[7]   Anchoring of deep brain stimulation electrodes using a microplate [J].
Favre, J ;
Taha, JM ;
Steel, T ;
Burchiel, KJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 85 (06) :1181-1183
[8]   Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery [J].
Hariz, MI .
MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2002, 17 :S162-S166
[9]   Tolerance and tremor rebound following long-term chronic thalamic stimulation for parkinsonian and essential tremor [J].
Hariz, MI ;
Shamsgovara, P ;
Johansson, F ;
Hariz, GM ;
Fodstad, H .
STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 72 (2-4) :208-218
[10]  
JIMENEZ JC, 2002, MOV DISORD S5, V17, P673