Elevated expression of cyclooxygenase-2 is a negative prognostic factor for disease free survival and overall survival in patients with breast carcinoma

被引:211
作者
Denkert, C
Winzer, KJ
Müller, BM
Weichert, W
Pest, S
Köbel, M
Kristiansen, G
Reles, A
Siegert, A
Guski, H
Hauptmann, S
机构
[1] Charite Hosp, Inst Pathol, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Hosp, Dept Gen Visceral Vascular & Thorac Surg, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Hlth Sci Publ Hlth, Epidemiol Unit, Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Berlin, Germany
关键词
cyclooxygenase-2; cyclooxygenase-1; breast carcinoma; prognostic factor;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.11437
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Cyclooxygenases regulate the production of prostaglandins and play a role in tumor development and progression. The authors investigated the prognostic impact of expression of the cyclooxygenase (COX) isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, on disease-free survival and progression-free survival in patients with primary breast carcinoma as well as the association between COX expression and other clinicopathologic parameters. METHODS. in this study COX isoform expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 221 patients with primary breast carcinoma. RESULTS. Expression of COX-2 was detected in 36% of breast carcinoma samples and was associated significantly with several clinicopathologic parameters, including positive lymph node status (P < 0.0005), larger tumor size (P < 0.0005), poor differentiation (P < 0.0005), vascular invasion (P = 0.03), and negative estrogen receptor status (P = 0.04). In contrast, COX-I was expressed in 45% of tumors and was associated with smaller tumor size (P = 0.02) and with negative lymph node status (P = 0.01). In a univariate survival analysis, a significant association was observed between elevated COX-2 expression and decreases in disease-free survival (P = 0.0007) and overall survival (P = 0.02). In a multivariate analysis, expression of COX-2 was of borderline significance for disease-free survival (relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-3.59), adjusting for tumor size, histologic grade, number of positive lymph nodes, and patient age. Elevated expression of COX-1 in tumor tissue had no statistically significant influence on patient prognosis. CONCLUSIONS. The current data suggest that increased expression of COX-2 may play a role in the progression of primary breast carcinoma. It remains to be investigated whether treatment with selective inhibitors of COX-2 may be an additional therapeutic option for patients with breast carcinoma. (C) 2003 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2978 / 2987
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Alshafie GA, 2000, ONCOL REP, V7, P1377
[2]   Cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression is associated with angiogenesis and lymph node metastasis in human breast cancer [J].
Costa, C ;
Soares, R ;
Reis-Filho, JS ;
Leitao, D ;
Amendoeira, I ;
Schmitt, FC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 55 (06) :429-434
[3]  
Eifel P, 2001, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V93, P979
[4]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[5]   Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer [J].
Goldhirsch, A ;
Glick, JH ;
Gelber, RD ;
Senn, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (21) :1601-1608
[6]  
Half E, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P1676
[7]  
Harris RE, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P2101
[8]   Cyclooxygenase-5: a target for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer [J].
Howe, LR ;
Subbaramaiah, K ;
Brown, AMC ;
Dannenberg, AJ .
ENDOCRINE-RELATED CANCER, 2001, 8 (02) :97-114
[9]   Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in human breast cancer [J].
Hwang, D ;
Scollard, D ;
Byrne, J ;
Levine, E .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (06) :455-460
[10]   Cancer statistics, 2002 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Thomas, A ;
Murray, T ;
Thun, M .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (01) :23-47