General Evaluability Theory

被引:291
作者
Hsee, Christopher K. [1 ]
Zhang, Jiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Sch Business Adm, Miami, FL USA
关键词
evaluation mode; scope sensitivity; duration neglect; preference reversal; temporal discounting; PROBABILITY-WEIGHTING FUNCTION; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; AFFECTIVE PSYCHOLOGY; SEPARATE EVALUATIONS; EASTERLIN PARADOX; EVALUATION MODE; JOINT; HAPPINESS; DECISIONS; MONEY;
D O I
10.1177/1745691610374586
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学];
摘要
A central question in psychology and economics is the determination of whether individuals react differently to different values of a cared-about attribute (e.g., different income levels, different gas prices, and different ambient temperatures). Building on and significantly extending our earlier work on preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations, we propose a general evaluability theory (GET) that specifies when people are value sensitive and when people mispredict their own or others' value sensitivity. The GET can explain and unify many seemingly unrelated findings, ranging from duration neglect to affective forecasting errors and can generate many new research directions on topics ranging from temporal discounting to subjective well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 355
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]
When does duration matter in judgment and decision making? [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2000, 129 (04) :508-523
[2]
Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences [J].
Ariely, D ;
Loewenstein, G ;
Prelec, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 118 (01) :73-105
[3]
THE INCONSISTENT ROLE OF COMPARISON OTHERS AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN REACTIONS TO HYPOTHETICAL JOB DESCRIPTIONS - IMPLICATIONS FOR JOB ACCEPTANCE DECISIONS [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
SCHROTH, HA ;
SHAH, PP ;
DIEKMANN, KA ;
TENBRUNSEL, AE .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 60 (03) :326-352
[4]
Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences [J].
Bazerman, MH ;
Tenbrunsel, AE ;
Wade-Benzoni, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1998, 23 (02) :225-241
[5]
REVERSALS OF PREFERENCE IN ALLOCATION DECISIONS - JUDGING AN ALTERNATIVE VERSUS CHOOSING AMONG ALTERNATIVES [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
LOEWENSTEIN, GF ;
WHITE, SB .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (02) :220-240
[6]
LOTTERY WINNERS AND ACCIDENT VICTIMS - IS HAPPINESS RELATIVE [J].
BRICKMAN, P ;
COATES, D ;
JANOFFBULMAN, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 36 (08) :917-927
[7]
Brickmann P., 1971, ADAPTATION LEVEL THE, P287, DOI DOI 10.3389/FPSYG.2018.01158
[8]
The Susceptibility of Mental Accounting Principles to Evaluation Mode Effects [J].
Chatterjee, Subimal ;
Heath, Timothy B. ;
Min, Junhong .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2009, 22 (02) :120-137
[9]
Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Frijters, Paul ;
Shields, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) :95-144
[10]
CRYDER CE, 2008, SOC JUDG DEC MAK PRE