The Dynamics of Interorganizational Careers

被引:120
作者
Bidwell, Matthew [1 ]
Briscoe, Forrest [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
careers; interfirm mobility; labor markets; organizational size; matching; skills development; information technology workers; ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE; JOB MOBILITY; CAPITAL-INVESTMENT; EMPLOYEE TURNOVER; LABOR-MARKETS; WORK; INFORMATION; AGE; COMPENSATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1090.0492
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
How do workers build careers across organizations? We propose that increased worker mobility means that workers may now build their careers using interorganizational career ladders, working in certain kinds of organizations earlier in a career and in other kinds of organizations later in the career. We develop a matching framework that predicts such interorganizational moves based on how systematic changes in workers' needs and resources over the course of their careers alter the kinds of organizations they will best match. We specifically propose that workers will be more likely to work for organizations that provide more training early in their careers, and work for organizations that have higher demands for skills later in their careers. We use this argument to make three broad predictions: first, that interorganizational transitions are more likely to take place from larger to smaller workplaces, and into organizations in industries that employ a higher proportion of workers in the focal occupation; second, that such skill-based career paths are more common where the labor market provides more opportunities that reward those skills; and third, that the nature of external opportunities will disproportionately affect turnover from organizations on the lower rungs of the career ladder. Data from the career histories of college-educated information technology workers support our hypotheses.
引用
收藏
页码:1034 / 1053
页数:20
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]   Why do firms train? Theory and evidence [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Pischke, JS .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (01) :79-119
[2]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[3]  
Allison Paul D., 1984, Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data
[4]   Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? [J].
Almeida, P ;
Dokko, G ;
Rosenkopf, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) :301-315
[5]   Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions [J].
Ang, S ;
Slaughter, S ;
Ng, KY .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (11) :1427-1445
[6]  
Arthur M.B., 1996, BOUNDARYLESS CAREER, P3
[7]   THE INTERNAL ECONOMICS OF THE FIRM - EVIDENCE FROM PERSONNEL DATA [J].
BAKER, G ;
GIBBS, M ;
HOLMSTROM, B .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (04) :881-919
[8]  
BARON JN, 1984, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V10, P37
[9]   BRINGING THE FIRMS BACK IN - STRATIFICATION, SEGMENTATION, AND THE ORGANIZATION OF WORK [J].
BARON, JN ;
BIELBY, WT .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1980, 45 (05) :737-765
[10]   Employing identities in organizational ecology [J].
Baron, JN .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2004, 13 (01) :3-32