Mapping the Moral Domain

被引:1601
作者
Graham, Jesse [1 ]
Nosek, Brian A. [2 ]
Haidt, Jonathan [2 ]
Iyer, Ravi [1 ]
Koleva, Spassena [3 ]
Ditto, Peter H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Psychol & Social Behav, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
morality; scale validation; moral foundations; culture; values; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PERSONALITY; DISGUST; VALUES; SCALE; CONSERVATIVES; SENSITIVITY; PSYCHOLOGY; PRINCIPLES;
D O I
10.1037/a0021847
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the internal and external validity of the scale and the model, and in doing so we present new findings about morality: (a) Comparative model fitting of confirmatory factor analyses provides empirical justification for a 5-factor structure of moral concerns; (b) convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant; and (c) we establish pragmatic validity of the measure in providing new knowledge and research opportunities concerning demographic and cultural differences in moral intuitions. These analyses provide evidence for the usefulness of Moral Foundations Theory in simultaneously increasing the scope and sharpening the resolution of psychological views of morality.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 385
页数:20
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CHARITABLE GIV UNPUB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, Understanding human values
  • [3] Appiah K. A., 2008, EXPT ETHICS
  • [4] The self-importance of moral identity
    Aquino, K
    Reed, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (06) : 1423 - 1440
  • [5] Aristotle, 1985, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
  • [6] Welfare states, solidarity and justice principles: Does the type really matter?
    Arts, W
    Gelissen, J
    [J]. ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 2001, 44 (04) : 283 - 299
  • [7] Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior
    Barriga, AQ
    Morrison, EM
    [J]. MERRILL-PALMER QUARTERLY-JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 47 (04): : 532 - 562
  • [8] Burke Edmund., 1790, REFLECTIONS REVOLUTI
  • [9] Cialdini R. B., 2009, Influence: Science and practice
  • [10] Costello A. B., 2005, PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT, V10, P7, DOI [DOI 10.7275/JYJ1-4868, 10.7275/jyj1-4868]