Validation of five commercially available ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus (serotype 1)

被引:18
作者
de Wit, JJ
Heijmans, JF
Mekkes, DR
van Loon, AAWM
机构
[1] Anim Hlth Serv, NL-7400 AA Deventer, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Med Vet, Dept Farm Anim Hlth, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Intervet Int BV, NL-5830 AA Boxmeer, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03079450120078743
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In this study, the results are reported from a validation study of five commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus ( IBDV), serotype 1. The specificity of the ELISAs varied from 63.8 to 100%. All ELISAs reached a sensitivity of 100% on sera between 14 and 21 days post-vaccination (d.p.v.) with two classical vaccines and a Delaware variant-E virus. Overall, most birds became positive between 8 and 11 d.p.v. As expected, the ELISA with the lowest specificity showed the highest sensitivity at 5 d.p.v. When the decrease in maternally derived antibodies against IBDV was measured, a highly significant correlation (P<0.001) was found for all ELISAs and the virus neutralization test (VNT). R-2 varied from 0.44 to 0.76, whereas the slope varied from 0.33 to 0.57. This indicates that there is a certain correlation between VNT and ELISA titres, but that the correlation differs from ELISA to ELISA. For all ELISAs, no significant (P<0.05) differences in level of antibodies were detected between antibody titres in breeder serum, egg yolk and progeny at 1 and 4 days of age. This validation of five commercially available ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against IBDV (serotype 1) shows that there are significant differences in their performance. Therefore, choosing an ELISA or interpreting ELISA results without knowing the technical performance should be avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 549
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Diseases of poultry
[2]  
BRAUNIUS WW, 1990, TIJDSCHR DIERGENEESK, V115, P207
[3]  
De Wit J.J., 1998, Polish Veterinary Journal, V3, P19
[4]  
de Wit JJ, 1998, TIJDSCHR DIERGENEESK, V123, P7
[5]   EFFICACY OF SUBCUTANEOUS APPLICATION OF LIVE INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VACCINE IN YOUNG CHICKENS WITH MATERNALLY DERIVED ANTIBODY [J].
KOMINE, K ;
OHTA, H ;
FUJII, H ;
WATANABE, Y ;
KAMATA, S ;
SUGIYAMA, M .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 57 (04) :647-653
[6]  
KOUWENHOVEN B, 1994, P INT S INF BURS DIS, P262
[7]  
LUTTICKEN D, 1981, DEUT TIERARZTL WOCH, V88, P506
[8]   IMMUNIZATION STUDIES WITH A CELL-CULTURE-ADAPTED INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS [J].
SKEELES, JK ;
LUKERT, PD ;
FLETCHER, OJ ;
LEONARD, JD .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1979, 23 (02) :456-465
[9]   EFFICACY OF 3 LIVE VACCINES AGAINST HIGHLY VIRULENT INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN CHICKENS WITH OR WITHOUT MATERNAL ANTIBODIES [J].
TSUKAMOTO, K ;
TANIMURA, N ;
KAKITA, S ;
OTA, K ;
MASE, M ;
IMAI, K ;
HIHARA, H .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1995, 39 (02) :218-229