Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines

被引:191
作者
Cluzeau, FA
Littlejohns, P
Grimshaw, JM
Feder, G
Moran, SE
机构
[1] St George Hosp, Sch Med, Hlth Care Evaluat Unit, London SW17 0RE, England
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, London, England
[3] St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, London, England
关键词
appraisal; clinical guidelines; instrument; quality; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/11.1.21
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Despite clinical guidelines penetrating every aspect of clinical practice and health policy, doubts persist over their ability to improve patient care. We have designed and tested a generic critical appraisal instrument, that assesses whether developers have minimized the biases inherent in creating guidelines, and addressed the requirements for effective implementation. Design. Thirty-seven items describing suggested predictors of guideline quality were grouped into three dimensions covering the rigour of development, clarity of presentation (including the context and content) and implementation issues. The ease of use, reliability and validity of the instrument was tested on a national sample of guidelines for the management of asthma, breast cancer, depression and coronary heart disease, with 120 appraisers. A numerical score was derived to allow comparison of guidelines within and between diseases. Results. The instrument has acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient, 0.68-0.84; intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.82-0.90). The results provided some evidence of validity (Pearson's correlation coefficient between appraisers' dimension scores and their global assessment was 0.49 for dimension one, 0.63 for dimension two and 0.40 for dimension three). The instrument could differentiate between national and local guidelines and was easy to apply. There was variation in the performance of guidelines with most not achieving a majority of criteria in each dimension. Conclusions. Use of this instrument should encourage developers to create guidelines that reflect relevant research evidence more accurately. Potential users or groups adapting guidelines for local use could apply the instrument to help decide which one to follow The National Health Service Executive is using the instrument to assist in deciding which guidelines to recommend to the UK National Health Sendee. This methodology forms the basis of a common approach to assessing guideline quality in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 28
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL
[2]   Clinical guidelines: Where next? [J].
Baker, R ;
Feder, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1997, 9 (06) :399-404
[3]  
Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215
[4]   Cronbach's alpha [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) :572-572
[5]   IMPLEMENTING MEDICAL GUIDELINES [J].
BROOK, RH .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8968) :132-132
[6]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS ON THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION IN THE UNBALANCED ONE-WAY CLASSIFICATION [J].
BURDICK, RK ;
MAQSOOD, F ;
GRAYBILL, FA .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1986, 15 (11) :3353-3378
[7]   SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS - REPORTING, UPDATING, AND CORRECTING SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF THE EFFECTS OF HEALTH-CARE [J].
CHALMERS, I ;
HAYNES, B .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6958) :862-865
[8]  
CHUZEAU F, 1997, J CLIN EFFECT, V2, P120
[9]  
CLUZEAU F, 1995, J INTERPROF CARE, V9, P227
[10]  
Donabedian A., 1982, The Criteria and Standards of Quality