Trovafloxacin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: Results of a double blind, multicenter comparison with imipenem/cilastatin

被引:28
作者
Donahue, PE
Smith, DL
Yellin, AE
Mintz, SJ
Bur, F
Luke, DR
机构
[1] Cook Cty Hosp, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[3] Los Angeles Cty & Univ So Calif, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Salt Lake Reg Med Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Hop Notre Dame de Bon Secours, Metz, France
[6] Pfizer Inc, Dept Clin Res, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00221-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Trovafloxacin, a new broad-spectrum fourth-generation quinolone, has in vitro activity against most gram-negative and grampositive anaerobes and aerobes. Trovafloxiacin is available as both an intravenous formulation, alatrofloxacin, and a single daily oral tablet. Excellent tissue pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability suggest usefulness in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Thus, the efficacy of alatrofloxacin followed by oral trovafloxacin was compared with the standard regimen of intravenous imipenem/cilastatin followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in this prospective, multicenter, double-blind trial. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either 300 mg alatrofloxacin daily followed by 200 mg oral trovafloxacin daily or 1 g imipenem/cilastatin intravenously thrice daily followed by 500 mg oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for up to 14 days following surgical intervention of a documented intra-abdominal infection. Efficacy was assessed at the end of therapy and at follow-up (day 30). RESULTS: At the end of the study, cure or improvement occurred in 83% (129/156) and 84% (127/152) of clinically evaluable patients in the trovafloxacin and comparative groups, respectively. Pathogen eradication rates, adverse-event profiles, and significant laboratory abnormalities were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous alatrofloxacin with or without oral trovafloxacin was as effective as intravenous imipenem/cilastatin followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in complicated intraabdominal infections. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:53S / 61S
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Comparative in vitro activities of trovafloxacin (CP 99,219) and other antimicrobials against clinically significant anaerobes [J].
Aldridge, KE ;
Ashcraft, D ;
Bowman, KA .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 41 (02) :484-487
[2]   A comparison of imipenem/cilastatin with the combination of cefuroxime and metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections [J].
Angeras, MH ;
Darle, N ;
Hamnstrom, K ;
Ekelund, M ;
Engstrom, L ;
Takala, J ;
Viste, A ;
Holme, JB .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 28 (05) :513-518
[3]  
AOKI FY, 1983, SURGERY, V93, P221
[4]   INSURANCE-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN THE RISK OF RUPTURED APPENDIX [J].
BRAVEMAN, P ;
SCHAAF, VM ;
EGERTER, S ;
BENNETT, T ;
SCHECTER, W .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (07) :444-449
[5]   MEROPENEM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
BRISMAR, B ;
MALMBORG, AS ;
TUNEVALL, G ;
LINDGREN, V ;
BERGMAN, L ;
MENTZING, LO ;
NYSTROM, PO ;
ANSEHN, S ;
BACKSTRAND, B ;
SKAU, T ;
ANDAKER, L ;
GUSTAFSSON, PP ;
KASHOLMTENGVE, B ;
SJOBERG, L ;
OLSSONLILJEQUIST, B ;
EKLUND, AE ;
NORD, CE .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1995, 35 (01) :139-148
[6]  
Christou NV, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P1193
[7]   Intravenous meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized patients [J].
Colardyn, F ;
Faulkner, KL .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 38 (03) :523-537
[8]  
CORMICAN MG, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V270, P2957
[9]  
ECKHAUSER FE, 1992, CLIN THER, V14, P97
[10]   A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL OF PIPERACILLIN TAZOBACTAM VERSUS IMIPENEM CILASTATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF SEVERE INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS [J].
EKLUND, AE ;
NORD, CE .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 31 :79-85