Acute pancreatic transplant rejection: Evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging compared with histopathologic analysis

被引:29
作者
Krebs, TL
Daly, B
Wong-You-Cheong, JJ
Carroll, K
Bartlett, ST
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance (MR); contrast enhancement; tissue characterization; pancreas; MR; transplantation;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99fe15437
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of dynamic contrast material-enhanced gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging for the diagnosis of acute pancreatic transplant rejection, as confirmed at histopathologic analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty MR imaging studies were performed in 25 patients within 3 days of percutaneous biopsy or pancreatectomy. The mean percentage of parenchymal enhancement (MPPE) at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was calculated. RESULTS: Biopsy findings were no evidence of rejection (n = 7 [23%]), mild rejection (n = 10 [33%]), moderate (n = 6 [20%]) and severe (n = 2 [7%]) acute rejection, and infarction (n = 5 [17%]). The corresponding MPPEs at 1 minute were 106%, 66%, 62%, 57%, and 3%, respectively. Overlap of cases in the normal and rejection groups occurred; however, using an MPPE cutoff of 100% resulted in a sensitivity of 96%. An MPPE over 120% was seen in the normal group only. The MPPE was significantly greater in the normal group than in the rejection or infarction group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is highly sensitive for the detection of acute pancreatic transplant rejection. Because of overlap of cases in the normal and rejection groups, percutaneous biopsy may be needed in some cases. Pancreatic allografts with infarction can be clearly identified.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of pancreas transplants [J].
Aideyan, OA ;
Schmidt, AJ ;
Trenkner, SW ;
Hakim, NS ;
Gruessner, RWG ;
Walsh, JW .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) :825-828
[2]  
ALLEN RDM, 1990, TRANSPLANT P, V22, P663
[3]  
Bartlett ST, 1996, ANN SURG, V224, P440, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199610000-00003
[4]   PANCREATIC TRANSPLANTS - CT-GUIDED BIOPSY [J].
BERNARDINO, M ;
FERNANDEZ, M ;
NEYLAN, J ;
HERTZLER, G ;
WHELCHEL, J ;
OLSON, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (03) :709-711
[5]  
CORRY RJ, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P547
[6]   Evaluation of pancreas transplant needle biopsy - Reproducibility and revision of histologic grading system [J].
Drachenberg, CB ;
Papadimitriou, JC ;
Klassen, DK ;
Racusen, LC ;
HoehnSaric, EW ;
Weir, MR ;
Kuo, PC ;
Schweitzer, EJ ;
Johnson, LB ;
Bartlett, ST .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (11) :1579-1586
[7]  
DUBERNARD JM, 1981, TRANSPLANT P, V13, P305
[8]   DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC TRANSPLANT DYSFUNCTION - VALUE OF GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE-ENHANCED MR IMAGING [J].
FERNANDEZ, MD ;
BERNARDINO, ME ;
NEYLAN, JF ;
OLSON, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (06) :1171-1176
[9]  
FLORACK G, 1985, TRANSPLANT P, V17, P374
[10]   PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY OF PANCREAS TRANSPLANTS [J].
GABER, AO ;
HATHAWAY, D ;
GABER, LW ;
SHOKOUHAMIRI, MH .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 54 (03) :548-567