Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

被引:397
作者
Piñol, V
Castells, A
Andreu, M
Castellví-Bel, S
Alenda, C
Llor, X
Xicola, RM
Rodríguez-Moranta, F
Payá, A
Jover, R
Bessa, X
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Hosp Clin, Inst Malalties Digest,Dept Gastroenterol, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp del Mar, Dept Gastroenterol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Gen Univ Alicante, Dept Pathol, Alicante, Spain
[4] Hosp Gen Univ Alicante, Dept Gastroenterol, Alicante, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Germans Trias & Pujol, Dept Gastroenterol, Badalona, Spain
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2005年 / 293卷 / 16期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.293.16.1986
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context The selection of individuals for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic testing is challenging. Recently, the National Cancer Institute outlined a new set of recommendations, the revised Bethesda guidelines, for the identification of individuals with HNPCC who should be tested for microsatellite instability. Objective To establish the most effective and efficient strategy for the detection of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers. Design, Setting, and Patients A prospective, multicenter, nationwide study (the EPICOLON study) in 20 hospitals in the general community in Spain of 1222 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, between November 1, 2000, and October 31, 2001. Interventions Microsatellite instability testing and MSH2/MLH1 immunostaining in all patients regardless of age, personal or family history, and tumor characteristics. Patients whose tumors exhibited microsatellite instability and/or lack of protein expression underwent MSH2/MLH1 germline testing. Main Outcome Measures Effectiveness and efficiency of both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining, either directly or previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines, were evaluated with respect to the presence of MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations. Results Two hundred eighty-seven patients (23.5%) fulfilled the revised Bethesda guidelines. Ninety-one patients (7.4%) had a mismatch repair deficiency, with tumors exhibiting either microsatellite instability (n = 83) or loss of protein expression (n = 81). Germ-line testing identified 11 mutations (0.9%) in either MSH2 (7 cases) or MLH1 (4 cases) genes. Strategies based on either microsatellite instability testing or immunostaining previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines were the most effective (sensitivity, 81.8% and 81.8%; specificity, 98.0% and 98.2%; positive predictive value, 27.3% and 29.0%, respectively) to identify MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the revised Bethesda guidelines as the most discriminating set of clinical parameters (odds ratio, 33.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-250; P=.001). Conclusion The revised Bethesda. guidelines constitute a useful approach to identify patients at risk for HNPCC. In patients fulfilling these criteria, both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining are equivalent and highly effective strategies to further select those patients who should be tested for MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations.
引用
收藏
页码:1986 / 1994
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Incidence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and the feasibility of molecular screening for the disease [J].
Aaltonen, LA ;
Salovaara, R ;
Kristo, P ;
Canzian, F ;
Hemminki, A ;
Peltomäki, P ;
Chadwick, RB ;
Kääriäinen, H ;
Eskelinen, M ;
Järvinen, H ;
Mecklin, JP ;
de la Chapelle, A ;
Percesepe, A ;
Ahtola, H ;
Härkönen, N ;
Julkunen, R ;
Kangas, E ;
Ojala, S ;
Tulikoura, J ;
ValKamo, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (21) :1481-1487
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MAN STAG CANC
[4]  
Boland CR, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P5248
[5]   Prevalence of germline mutations of MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families from Spain [J].
Caldes, T ;
Godino, J ;
de la Hoya, M ;
Carbonero, IG ;
Segura, PP ;
Eng, C ;
Benito, M ;
Diaz-Rubio, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 98 (05) :774-779
[6]   Antibody-based screening for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma compared with microsatellite analysis and sequencing [J].
Christensen, M ;
Katballe, N ;
Wikman, F ;
Primdahl, H ;
Sorensen, FB ;
Laurberg, S ;
Orntoft, TF .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (11) :2422-2430
[7]   The frequency of hereditary defective mismatch repair in a prospective series of unselected colorectal carcinomas [J].
Cunningham, JM ;
Kim, CY ;
Christensen, ER ;
Tester, DJ ;
Parc, Y ;
Burgart, LJ ;
Halling, KC ;
McDonnell, SK ;
Schaid, DJ ;
Vockley, CW ;
Kubly, V ;
Nelson, H ;
Michels, VV ;
Thibodeau, SN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 69 (04) :780-790
[8]   Microsatellite instability, immunohistochemistry, and additional PMS2 staining in suspected hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer [J].
de Jong, AE ;
van Puijenbroek, M ;
Hendriks, Y ;
Tops, C ;
Wijnen, J ;
Ausems, MGEM ;
Meijers-Heijboer, H ;
Wagner, A ;
van Os, TAM ;
Bröcker-Vriends, AHJT ;
Vasen, HFA ;
Morreau, H .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 10 (03) :972-980
[10]  
Dietmaier W, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P4749