The Yuzpe regimen of emergency contraception: How long after the morning after?

被引:28
作者
Trussell, J
Ellertson, C
Rodriguez, G
机构
[1] PRINCETON UNIV, WOODROW WILSON SCH PUBL & INT AFFAIRS, PRINCETON, NJ 08544 USA
[2] POPULAT COUNCIL, NEW YORK, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0029-7844(96)00036-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether failure of the Yuzpe method of emergency contraception (which involves taking a higher than usual dose of ordinary combined oral contraceptives within 72 hours after unprotected intercourse, with a second dose taken 12 hours later) depends on the interval between intercourse and treatment. Data Sources: We searched the literature for studies in which investigators separately reported both the number of women treated with the Yuzpe regimen and the resulting pregnancies when treatment was started on the first, second, and third days after unprotected intercourse. Searches of the electronic data bases MEDLINE, POPLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS were supplemented by scrutiny of the bibliographies of all papers identified through the electronic search. Methods of Study Selection: We identified nine published studies that present the number of women treated and outcome of treatment by time since unprotected intercourse. We included all nine studies in our analysis. Tabulation, Integration, and Results: Differences in failure rates by time of treatment adjusted for study-site effects were analyzed using logistic regression. We found no significant differences in failure rates when therapy was started on the first, second, or third day after unprotected intercourse. The large sample size ensured a power of 76% to reject the null hypothesis of equal failure rates when the odds of failure on the third day are twice those on the first and second days. Conclusion: Our results have two clinical implications. First, insistence on taking the first dose as soon as possible may be counterproductive in circumstances when taking the second dose 12 hours later would be difficult. Second, clinical protocols that deny treatment after 72 hours may be excessively restrictive, particularly if the alternative of emergency insertion of a copper intrauterine device is not immediately available or appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1990, Analysis of categorical data
[2]  
[Anonymous], FERTILITY CONTROL RE
[3]   ETHINYL ESTRADIOL AND D-NORGESTREL IS AN EFFECTIVE EMERGENCY POSTCOITAL CONTRACEPTIVE - A REPORT OF ITS USE IN 1,200 PATIENTS IN A FAMILY-PLANNING CLINIC [J].
BAGSHAW, SN ;
EDWARDS, D ;
TUCKER, AK .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 28 (02) :137-140
[4]  
BURTON R, 1990, BR J FAM PLANN, V15, P119
[5]   ETHINYL ESTRADIOL AND CONJUGATED ESTROGENS AS POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTIVES [J].
DIXON, GW ;
SCHLESSELMAN, JJ ;
ORY, HW ;
BLYE, RP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 244 (12) :1336-1339
[6]  
Friedman EHI, 1987, BR J FAM PLANN, V13, P139
[7]   THE MORNING-AFTER PILL - HOW LONG AFTER [J].
GROU, F ;
RODRIGUES, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (06) :1529-1534
[8]   A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF LEVONORGESTREL WITH THE YUZPE REGIMEN IN POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTION [J].
HO, PC ;
KWAN, MSW .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1993, 8 (03) :389-392
[9]  
KANE LA, 1989, NEW ZEAL MED J, V102, P151
[10]   POST-COITAL CONTRACEPTION BY ESTROGEN PROGESTAGEN COMBINATION OR IUD INSERTION [J].
LUERTI, M ;
TONTA, A ;
FERLA, P ;
MOLLA, R ;
SANTINI, F .
CONTRACEPTION, 1986, 33 (01) :61-68