A geometric approach to multiperiod mean variance optimization of assets and liabilities

被引:123
作者
Leippold, M
Trojani, F
Vanini, P
机构
[1] Univ So Switzerland, Inst Finance, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Swiss Banking Inst, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
assets and liabilities portfolios; minimum-variance frontiers; dynamic programming; Markowitz model;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00067-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present a geometric approach to discrete time multiperiod mean variance portfolio optimization that largely simplifies the mathematical analysis and the economic interpretation of such model settings. We show that multiperiod mean variance optimal policies can be decomposed in an orthogonal set of basis strategies, each having a clear economic interpretation. This implies that the corresponding multiperiod mean variance frontiers are spanned by an orthogonal basis of dynamic returns. Specifically, in a k-period model the optimal strategy is a linear combination of a single k-period global minimum second moment strategy and a sequence of k local excess return strategies which expose the dynamic portfolio optimally to each single-period asset excess return. This decomposition is a multi period version of Hansen and Richard (Econometrica (1987)) orthogonal representation of single-period mean variance frontiers and naturally extends the basic economic intuition of the static Markowitz model to the multiperiod context. Using the geometric approach to dynamic mean variance optimization we obtain closed form solutions in the i.i.d. setting for portfolios consisting of both assets and liabilities (AL), each modelled by a distinct state variable. As a special case, the solution of the mean variance problem for the asset only case in Li and Ng (Mathematical Finance 10 (2000)) follows directly and can be represented in terms of simple products of some single period orthogonal returns. We illustrate the usefulness of our geometric representation of multiperiods optimal policies and mean variance frontiers by discussing specific issues related to AL portfolios: The impact of taking liabilities into account on the implied mean variance frontiers, the quantification of the impact of the rebalancing frequency and the determination of the optimal initial funding ratio. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1113
页数:35
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO REVISION POLICY [J].
CHEN, AHY ;
JEN, FC ;
ZIONTS, S .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1971, 44 (01) :51-61
[2]  
Cvitani J., 1992, ANN APPL PROBAB, V2, P767, DOI 10.1214/aoap/1177005576
[3]   OPTIMAL DYNAMIC TRADING WITH LEVERAGE CONSTRAINTS [J].
GROSSMAN, SJ ;
VILA, JL .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1992, 27 (02) :151-168
[4]   THE ROLE OF CONDITIONING INFORMATION IN DEDUCING TESTABLE RESTRICTIONS IMPLIED BY DYNAMIC ASSET PRICING-MODELS [J].
HANSEN, LP ;
RICHARD, SF .
ECONOMETRICA, 1987, 55 (03) :587-613
[5]   CONSUMPTION AND PORTFOLIO POLICIES WITH INCOMPLETE MARKETS AND SHORT-SALE CONSTRAINTS - THE INFINITE DIMENSIONAL CASE [J].
HE, H ;
PEARSON, ND .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1991, 54 (02) :259-304
[6]  
He H., 1993, ECON THEOR, V3, P663, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01210265
[7]  
He H., 1991, MATH FINANC, V1, P1
[8]   MARTINGALE AND DUALITY METHODS FOR UTILITY MAXIMIZATION IN AN INCOMPLETE MARKET [J].
KARATZAS, I ;
LEHOCZKY, JP ;
SHREVE, SE ;
XU, GL .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 1991, 29 (03) :702-730
[9]  
Keel A., 1995, ASTIN BULL, V25, P33, DOI [10.2143/AST.25.1.563252, DOI 10.2143/AST.25.1.563252]
[10]  
LEIPPOLD M, 2002, ASSET LIABILITY MANA