Linear indices in nonlinear structural equation models: best fitting proper indices and other composites

被引:52
作者
Dijkstra, Theo K. [1 ]
Henseler, Jorg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Econ & Econometr, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, NL-6500 HK Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Best fitting proper indices; Generalized canonical variables; Partial least squares; Latent factor scores; Indices; Interaction; Flat maximum; FORMATIVE MEASUREMENT; BREIVIK; HOWELL;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-010-9359-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The recent advent of nonlinear structural equation models with indices poses a new challenge to the measurement of scientific constructs. We discuss, exemplify and add to a family of statistical methods aimed at creating linear indices, and compare their suitability in a complex path model with linear and moderating relationships. The composites used include principal components, generalized canonical variables, partial least squares, factor extraction ('LISREL'), and a newly developed method: best fitting proper indices. The latter involves the construction of linear combinations of indicators that maximize the fit of (non-)linear structural equations in terms of these indices; the weights as well as the loadings of the indicators are sign restricted so that each indicator contributes to as well as reflects its own index in a predefined way. We use cross-validation to evaluate the methods employed, and analyze the most general situation with a complete interaction specification using the bootstrap. The methods are exemplified using an empirical data set. An additional novel feature is the use of simulations to delineate the range of the possible parameter estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:1505 / 1518
页数:14
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Anderson T. W., 1956, P 3 BERK S MATH STAT, V150
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1966, Research Papers in Statistics: Festschrift for J. Neyman
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]   On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007) [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (02) :229-237
[5]   CONVENTIONAL WISDOM ON MEASUREMENT - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION PERSPECTIVE [J].
BOLLEN, K ;
LENNOX, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (02) :305-314
[6]   Interpretational confounding is due to misspecification, not to type of indicator: Comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007) [J].
Bollen, Kenneth A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 12 (02) :219-228
[7]   ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLICATIVE COMBINATION RULES WHEN THE CAUSAL VARIABLES ARE MEASURED WITH ERROR [J].
BUSEMEYER, JR ;
JONES, LE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1983, 93 (03) :549-562
[8]   A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study [J].
Chin, WW ;
Marcolin, BL ;
Newsted, PR .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (02) :189-217
[10]  
DAVISON AC, 2003, BOOTSTRAP METHODS TH