High False- Negative Rate of HER2 Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction of the Oncotype DX Test: An Independent Quality Assurance Study

被引:120
作者
Dabbs, David J. [1 ]
Klein, Molly E. [1 ]
Mohsin, Syed K. [3 ]
Tubbs, Raymond R. [4 ]
Shuai, Yongli [2 ]
Bhargava, Rohit [1 ]
机构
[1] UPMC, Magee Womens Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh Canc Inst, Biostat Facil, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Riverside Methodist Hosp, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; LASER-MICRODISSECTION; RT-PCR; GENE; IDENTIFICATION; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA; SECTIONS; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7963
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose HER2 (ERBB2) status is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast carcinoma. In recent years, Genomic Health (GHI), purveyors of the Oncotype DX test, has been separately reporting HER2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to oncologists. Because of the lack of independent evaluation, this quality assurance study was undertaken to define the concordance rate between immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and GHI RT-PCR HER2 assay. Methods All patients at three participating laboratories (Magee-Womens Hospital [Pittsburgh, PA], Cleveland Clinic [Cleveland, OH], and Riverside Methodist Hospital [Columbus, OH]) with available HER2 RT-PCR results from GHI were included in this study. All IHC-positive and equivocal patient cases were further evaluated and classified by FISH at respective laboratories. Results Of the total 843 patient cases, 784 (93%) were classified as negative, 36 (4%) as positive, and 23 (3%) as equivocal at the three institutions using IHC/FISH. Of the 784 negative patient cases, 779 (99%) were also classified as negative by GHI RT-PCR assay. However, all 23 equivocal patient cases were reported as negative by GHI. Of the 36 positive cases, only 10 (28%; 95% CI, 14% to 45%) were reported as positive, 12 (33%) as equivocal, and 14 (39%) as negative. Conclusion There was an unacceptable false-negative rate for HER2 status with GHI HER2 assay in this independent study. This could create confusion in the decision-making process for targeted treatment and potentially lead to mismanagement of patients with breast cancer if only GHI HER2 information is used. J Clin Oncol 29: 4279-4285. (C) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:4279 / 4285
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], GUID IND FDA STAFF S
  • [2] Intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma revealed by laser-microdissection and comparative genomic hybridization
    Aubele, M
    Mattis, A
    Zitzelsberger, H
    Walch, A
    Kremer, M
    Hutzler, P
    Höfler, H
    Werner, M
    [J]. CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1999, 110 (02) : 94 - 102
  • [3] Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Assessment in a Case-Control Study: Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Performed by Central Laboratories
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Achacoso, Ninah
    Maddala, Tara
    Shak, Steve
    Quesenberry, Charles P., Jr.
    Goldstein, Lynn C.
    Gown, Allen M.
    Habel, Laurel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (28) : 4300 - 4306
  • [4] Benöhr P, 2005, ANTICANCER RES, V25, P1895
  • [5] Bohm M, 1997, AM J PATHOL, V151, P63
  • [6] Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression As a Prognostic Factor in a Large Tissue Microarray Series of Node-Negative Breast Cancers
    Chia, Stephen
    Norris, Brian
    Speers, Caroline
    Cheang, Maggie
    Gilks, Blake
    Gown, Allen M.
    Huntsman, David
    Olivotto, Ivo A.
    Nielsen, Torsten O.
    Gelmon, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (35) : 5697 - 5704
  • [7] Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues - Development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay
    Cronin, M
    Pho, M
    Dutta, D
    Stephans, JC
    Shak, S
    Kiefer, MC
    Esteban, JM
    Baker, JB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2004, 164 (01) : 35 - 42
  • [8] Laser capture microdissection
    EmmertBuck, MR
    Bonner, RF
    Smith, PD
    Chuaqui, RF
    Zhuang, ZP
    Goldstein, SR
    Weiss, RA
    Liotta, LA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5289) : 998 - 1001
  • [9] Immuno-LCM: Laser capture microdissection of immunostained frozen sections for mRNA analysis
    Fend, F
    Emmert-Buck, MR
    Chuaqui, R
    Cole, K
    Lee, J
    Liotta, LA
    Raffeld, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 154 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [10] Real-time quantitative PCR of microdissected paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma -: An alternative method for HER-2/neu analysis
    Gjerdrum, LM
    Sorensen, BS
    Kjeldsen, E
    Sorensen, FB
    Nexo, E
    Hamilton-Dutoit, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2004, 6 (01) : 42 - 51