Perception of the consequences of self-action is temporally tuned and event driven

被引:178
作者
Bays, PM
Wolpert, DM
Flanagan, JR
机构
[1] UCL, Neurol Inst, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Queens Univ, Ctr Neurosci Studies, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.023
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
It has been proposed that in order to increase the salience of sensations with an external cause, sensations that are predictable based on one's own actions are attenuated [1, 2]. This may explain why self-imposed tickle [3, 4] or constant forces [5] are perceived as less intense than the same stimuli externally imposed. Here, subjects used their right index finger to tap a force sensor mounted above their left index finger. When a motor generated a tap on the left finger synchronously with the right tap, simulating contact between the fingers, the perception of force in the left finger was attenuated compared to the same tap experienced during rest. Attenuation gradually reduced as the left tap was either delayed or advanced relative to the active right tap. However, no attenuation was seen to left taps triggered by right-finger movements that stopped above or passed wide of the sensor. We conclude that there is a window of sensory attenuation that is broadly temporally tuned and centered on the time at which the fingers would normally make contact. That is, predictive tactile sensory attenuation is linked to specific external events arising from movement rather than to the movement per se.
引用
收藏
页码:1125 / 1128
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   VELOCITY-DEPENDENT SUPPRESSION OF CUTANEOUS SENSITIVITY DURING MOVEMENT [J].
ANGEL, RW ;
MALENKA, RC .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1982, 77 (02) :266-274
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1016/S0950-5601(54)80044-X
[3]   Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli [J].
Blakemore, SJ ;
Frith, CD ;
Wolpert, DM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 11 (05) :551-559
[4]  
CHAPMAN CE, 1987, EXP BRAIN RES, V68, P516
[5]   WHY CANT WE TICKLE OURSELVES [J].
CLAXTON, G .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1975, 41 (01) :335-338
[6]   Two eyes for an eye: The neuroscience of force escalation [J].
Shergill, SS ;
Bays, PM ;
Frith, CD ;
Wolpert, DM .
SCIENCE, 2003, 301 (5630) :187-187
[7]   NEURAL BASIS OF THE SPONTANEOUS OPTOKINETIC RESPONSE PRODUCED BY VISUAL INVERSION [J].
SPERRY, RW .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1950, 43 (06) :482-489
[8]   PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON TICKLING ONESELF [J].
WEISKRANTZ, L ;
ELLIOTT, J ;
DARLINGTON, C .
NATURE, 1971, 230 (5296) :598-+
[9]   Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location [J].
Williams, SR ;
Shenasa, J ;
Chapman, CE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (02) :947-963
[10]   Motor prediction [J].
Wolpert, DM ;
Flanagan, JR .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (18) :R729-R732