Dry-thermophilic anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of the municipal solid waste: Focusing on the inoculum sources

被引:131
作者
Forster-Carneiro, T. [1 ]
Perez, M. [1 ]
Romero, L. I. [1 ]
Sales, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cadiz, Fac Ciencias Mar & Ambientales, Dept Ingn Quim, Cadiz 11510, Spain
关键词
municipal solid waste; anaerobic digestion; dry conditions; inoculum; thermophilic; methane;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.008
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The effect of inoculum source on anaerobic thermophilic digestion of separately collected organic fraction of municipal solid wastes (SC_OFMSW) has been studied. Performance of laboratory scale reactors (V: 1.1 L) were evaluated using six different inoculums sources: (1) corn silage (CS); (2) restaurant waste digested mixed with rice hulls (RH_OFMSW); (3) cattle excrement (CATTLE); (4) swine excrement (SWINE); (5) digested sludge (SLUDGE); and (6) SWINE mixed with SLUDGE (1:1) (SWINE/SLUDGE). The SC_OFMSW was separately and collected from university restaurant. The selected conditions were: 25% of inoculum, 30% of total solid and 55 degrees C of temperature, optimum in the thermophilic range. The six inoculum sources showed an initial start-up phase in the range between 2 and 4 days and the initial methane generation began over 10 days operational process. Results indicated that SLUDGE is the best inoculum source for anaerobic thermophilic digestion of the treatment of organic fraction of municipal solid waste at dry conditions (30% TS). Over 60 days operating period, it was confirmed that SLUDGE reactor can achieve 44.0% COD removal efficiency and 43.0% VS removal. In stabilization phase, SLUDGE reactor showed higher volumetric biogas generated of 78.9 mL/day (or 35.6 mL CH4/day) reaching a methane yield of 0.53 L CH4/g VS. Also, SWINE/SLUDGE and SWINE were good inoculums at these experimental conditions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3195 / 3203
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
*APHA AM PUBL HLTH, 1989, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]   Semi-dry thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: focusing on the start-up phase [J].
Bolzonella, D ;
Innocenti, L ;
Pavan, P ;
Traverso, P ;
Cecchi, F .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 86 (02) :123-129
[3]  
BONZONELLA D, 2005, 4 INT S AN DIG SOL W, V1, P85
[4]   Effect of temperature on the performance of an anaerobic tubular reactor treating fruit and vegetable waste [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Haouari, O ;
Touhami, Y ;
Ben Cheikh, R ;
Marouani, L ;
Hamdi, A .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 39 (12) :2143-2148
[5]   Bioreactor performance in anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes [J].
Bouallagui, H ;
Touhami, Y ;
Cheikh, RB ;
Hamdi, M .
PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 40 (3-4) :989-995
[6]   Renewable methane from anaerobic digestion of biomass [J].
Chynoweth, DP ;
Owens, JM ;
Legrand, R .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2001, 22 (1-3) :1-8
[7]  
de la Rubia MA, 2002, CHEM BIOCHEM ENG Q, V16, P119
[8]  
DEBAERE L, 2005, 4 INT S AN DIG SOL W, V1, P34
[9]   Effect of temperature and temperature fluctuation on thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure [J].
El-Mashad, HM ;
Zeeman, G ;
van Loon, WKP ;
Bot, GPA ;
Lettinga, G .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 95 (02) :191-201
[10]  
Forster-Carneiro T, 2004, CHEM BIOCHEM ENG Q, V18, P429