Complications of fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks - An analysis of 1036 injections

被引:78
作者
Ma, DJ
Gilula, LA
Riew, KD
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Sch Med, Cerv Spine Serv, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.D.02139
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A number of serious complications associated with fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks have been reported in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of complications associated with these blocks and to determine whether needle positioning during the procedure affected the prevalence of complications at one institution. Methods: Between October 1999 and June 2003, we performed 1036 fluoroscopically guided extraforaminal cervical nerve blocks in 844 patients. Plain radiographs documenting the procedure were made as part of the standard quality-assurance protocol. An independent observer who was uninvolved with the procedures reviewed a prospectively kept database on all patients. We subsequently reviewed the patient records to identify complications. Results: There were no catastrophic complications such as vessel damage, paralysis, or death. Overall, fourteen patients (1.66%) had a minor complication in association with the procedure. With the numbers available, the rate of complications associated with pdeep injection (798 blocks) was not significantly different from that associated with shallow injection (238 blocks) (1.89% compared with 0.84%). However, the rate of complications associated with anterior placement of the needle tip (thirty-three blocks) was higher than that associated with ideal placement of the needle tip (904 blocks) (6.06% compared with 1.55%) (p = 0.04). Conclusions: No catastrophic complications occurred in this series of 1036 nerve blocks. We found that the medial-lateral needle depth as seen on frontal-view radiographs was not associated with complications, although the anterior positioning of the needle as seen on lateral-view radiographs was associated with minor complications. Our results suggest that, with our technique, cervical nerve blocks are relatively safe procedures. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1030
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
APRILL C, 2003, ISIS SCI NEWSLETTER, V4, P21
[2]
Cervical transforaminal injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery: a possible mechanism for spinal cord injury [J].
Baker, R ;
Dreyfuss, P ;
Mercer, S ;
Bogduk, N .
PAIN, 2003, 103 (1-2) :211-215
[3]
A cervical anterior spinal artery syndrome after diagnostic blockade of the right C6-nerve root [J].
Brouwers, PJAM ;
Kottink, EJBL ;
Simon, MAM ;
Prevo, RL .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (03) :397-399
[4]
Bush K, 1996, Eur Spine J, V5, P319, DOI 10.1007/BF00304347
[5]
ELKOHOURY GY, 1988, RADIOLOGY, V168, P554
[6]
FENTON DS, 2002, IMAGE SPINE INTERVEN, P85
[7]
Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections [J].
Furman, MB ;
Giovanniello, MT ;
O'Brien, EM .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (01) :21-25
[8]
Manchikanti L, 1999, Pain Physician, V2, P65
[9]
PALMER W, 2003, COMMUNICATION
[10]
ROGERS K, 2001, M IST INT SPIN INJ S