Intellectual property box regimes: effective tax rates and tax policy considerations

被引:59
作者
Evers, Lisa [1 ]
Miller, Helen [2 ]
Spengel, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] ZEW GmbH, Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, D-68161 Mannheim, Germany
[2] Inst Fiscal Studies, London WC1E 7AE, England
[3] Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Betriebswirtschaftslehre & B, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
Corporate taxation; Effective tax rate; Intellectual property; Patent box; Innovation box; Preferential tax rate; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; GEOGRAPHIC LOCALIZATION; LOCATION; COMPETITION; TECHNOLOGY; TAXATION; INCENTIVES; SPILLOVERS; CHOICE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10797-014-9328-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In 2014, 12 European countries are operating Intellectual Property (IP) Box regimes that provide substantially reduced rates of corporate tax for income derived from important forms of intellectual property. We describe the key features of the policies and incorporate them into forward-looking measures of the cost of capital and the effective average tax rate. We show that the treatment of expenses relating to IP income is particularly important in determining the effective tax burden. A key finding is that regimes that allow expenses to be deducted at the ordinary corporate income tax rate, as opposed to the lower IP Box tax rate, may result in negative effective average tax rates and can thereby provide a subsidy to unprofitable projects. We discuss the ways in which IP Boxes are likely to affect firms' decisions and relate this to possible policy aims. While some regimes attempt to link the tax benefit to real activities, others have designed a policy targeted at the income streams associated with intellectual property. A key concern is the role that IP Boxes may play in increased tax competition between European countries.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 530
页数:29
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, The Internationalisation of Business RD: Evidence, Impacts and Implications
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations
[3]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTIVE TAX LEVELS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ACT PLAN BAS ER PROF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, NBER Working Paper No. 11948
[6]   International taxation and multinational firm location decisions [J].
Barrios, Salvador ;
Huizinga, Harry ;
Laeven, Luc ;
Nicodeme, Gaetan .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (11-12) :946-958
[7]   Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997 [J].
Bloom, N ;
Griffith, R ;
Van Reenen, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2002, 85 (01) :1-31
[8]   Preferential tax regimes with asymmetric countries [J].
Bucovetsky, Sam ;
Haufler, Andreas .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2007, 60 (04) :789-795
[9]  
CAMERON G, 1996, RES EVALUAT, V6, P215
[10]  
Corrado C, 2005, STUD INCOME, V65, P11