Randomized controlled trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis: Relationship between methodological quality and outcome

被引:69
作者
de Vries, Annemarie C.
Besselink, Marc G. H.
Buskens, Erik
Ridwan, Ben U.
Schipper, Maria
van Erpecum, Karel J.
Gooszen, Hein G.
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol, Gastrointestinal Res Unit, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Utrecht, Dept Surg, Gastrointestinal Res Unit, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Utrecht, Dept Microbiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Biostat, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
pancreatitis; antibiotic prophylaxis; methodology; quality of; meta-analysis; necrotizing pancreatitis; necrosis;
D O I
10.1159/000108971
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis in relation to outcome. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs that studied the effectiveness of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis. A metaanalysis was performed with a random effects model. Methodological quality was quantified by a previously published scoring system ( range 0-17 points). Results: Six studies, with a total of 397 participants, obtained a methodological score of at least 5 points and were included. Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis had no significant effect on infection of pancreatic necrosis ( absolute risk reduction (ARR) 0.055; 95% CI -0.084 to 0.194) and mortality (ARR 0.058, 95% CI -0.017 to 0.134). Spearman correlation showed an inverse association between methodological quality and ARR for mortality ( correlation coefficient -0.841, p = 0.036). Conclusions: The inverse relationship between methodological quality and impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on mortality emphasizes the importance of high-quality RCTs. At present, adequate evidence for the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis is lacking. Copyright (C) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 538
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], CES SLOV GASTROENT H
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, GUID US ANT AG PED H, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1136/GUT.200A.057026, DOI 10.1136/GUT.2004.047126]
  • [3] [Anonymous], CES SLOV GASTROENT H
  • [4] Infections in pancreatic inflammatory disease: Clinical trials for antibiotic prophylaxis
    Bassi, C
    [J]. PANCREATOLOGY, 2001, 1 (03) : 210 - 212
  • [5] BEHAVIOR OF ANTIBIOTICS DURING HUMAN NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS
    BASSI, C
    PEDERZOLI, P
    VESENTINI, S
    FALCONI, M
    BONORA, A
    ABBAS, H
    BENINI, A
    BERTAZZONI, EM
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1994, 38 (04) : 830 - 836
  • [6] Natural course of acute pancreatitis
    Beger, HG
    Rau, B
    Mayer, J
    Pralle, U
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 21 (02) : 130 - 135
  • [7] Berild D, 2001, SCAND J INFECT DIS, V33, P63, DOI 10.1080/003655401750064103
  • [8] Prophylactic antibiotic use in severe acute pancreatitis: Hemlock, help, or hype?
    Brown, A
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : 1195 - 1198
  • [9] BUCHLER M, 1992, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V103, P1902
  • [10] Is late antibiotic prophylaxis effective in the prevention of secondary pancreatic infection?
    Cinar, E
    Ateskan, U
    Baysan, A
    Mas, MR
    Comert, B
    Yasar, M
    Ozyurt, M
    Yener, N
    Mas, N
    Ozkomur, E
    Altinatmaz, K
    [J]. PANCREATOLOGY, 2003, 3 (05) : 383 - 388