Mode of failure in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength-based (μTBS) and fracture-based (CNSB) mechanical testing

被引:78
作者
Armstrong, SR [1 ]
Keller, JC
Boyer, DB
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Dept Operat Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dow Inst Dent Res, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
microtensile bond rest; interfacial fracture toughness test; adhesion; dentin bonding agents; composite resin;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00070-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the failure mode between dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint produced with a chevron-notch short-bar (CNSB) and microtensile test methods. Methods: Forty teeth were randomly selected for microtensile and forty for CNSB specimen fabrication and stored in 0.5% chloramine T at 37 degreesC until respective static load to failure testing at 30 and 180 days. Failure modes were categorized by SEM and tested with Fisher's exact test. Within respective mechanical testing methods the probability of failure curve distributions being significantly different were analyzed by the Wald chi-square statistic. Results: The characteristic fracture toughness at 30- and 180-day storage was 0.82 and 0.87 MPa m(1/2), while the Weibull Modulus (m) for the failure distributions, was 4.60 and 4.56, respectively. No significant difference was demonstrated in the failure distributions between these groups (p = 0.45). The characteristic tensile strength (mu TBS degrees) at 30- and 180-day storage was 52.53 and 14.71 MPa with an m of 3.04 and 1.56, respectively. Failure distributions for mu TBS groups were significantly different (p < 0.001). K-IvM failure modes, regardless of storage time, were within the adhesive joint with 30-day debonds primarily through the top region of the hybrid layer (THL) and after 180-days involving the bottom of the hybrid layer (BHL). The 30-day <mu>TBS group demonstrated a propensity to debond in dentin or resin composite substrates but after 180-days storage debonds again involved the BHL. Significance: The weak links in the dentin-adhesive resin-resin composite bonded joint may be the interphase regions between the THL and the adhesive resin and the BHL and dentin. (C) 2001 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 210
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Alani AH, 1997, OPER DENT, V22, P173
[2]   COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF CERAMIC-METAL BOND TESTS USING FINITE-ELEMENT STRESS-ANALYSIS [J].
ANUSAVICE, KJ ;
DEHOFF, PH ;
FAIRHURST, CW .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1980, 59 (03) :608-613
[3]   Effect of hybrid layer on fracture toughness of adhesively bonded dentin-resin composite joint [J].
Armstrong, SR ;
Boyer, DB ;
Keller, JC ;
Park, JB .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (02) :91-98
[4]   Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives [J].
Armstrong, SR ;
Boyer, DB ;
Keller, JC .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (01) :44-50
[5]  
*ASTM, 1994, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, P856
[6]  
Burrow Michael F., 1993, Bulletin of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, V40, P173
[7]   3-DIMENSIONAL FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE SHEAR BOND TEST [J].
DEHOFF, PH ;
ANUSAVICE, KJ ;
WANG, ZX .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :126-131
[8]   SHEAR VS TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN COMPOSITE BONDED TO CERAMIC [J].
DELLABONA, A ;
VANNOORT, R .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (09) :1591-1596
[9]  
DILLARD DA, 1998, ADH SOC P 21 ANN M A, V21, P7
[10]   Current concepts on adhesion to dentin [J].
Eick, JD ;
Gwinnett, AJ ;
Pashley, DH ;
Robinson, SJ .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 1997, 8 (03) :306-335