Separation techniques hyphenated to electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics:: Capillary electrophoresis versus nanoliquid chromatography

被引:44
作者
Pelzing, M [1 ]
Neusüss, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Bruker Dialton GmbH, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
capillary zone electrophoresis; electrospray ionization; nanoliquid chromatography; proteomics; tandem mass spectrometry;
D O I
10.1002/elps.200410424
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Liquid chromatography (LC) nanoelectrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a key technology for the study of proteomics, with the main benefit to the characterization of sensitive peptides from complex mixtures. Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) has been taken into consideration sporadically due to the highly efficient separation and ability to handle low sample amount, yet classified as being less sensitive with respect to analyte concentration. The limitation in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) injection volumes can be overcome by on-line solid-phase extraction (SPE). Such an on-line SPE-CZE system was explored in combination with an ion trap (IT) mass spectrometer. Thus, it was possible to inject more than 100 mu L sample solution on to the CZE capillary. Concentration limits of detection as low as 100 amol/mu L were demonstrated for a peptide standard. This SPE-CZE-microelectrospray ionization (ESI)-MS/MS setup was compared directly to nanoLC/nanoESl using the same sample of a tryptic digest of bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a reference standard. Measurements were made on one IT mass spectrometer with identical acquisition parameters. Both chromatography systems enabled the separation and detection of low levels of peptides from a mixture of moderate complexity, with most peptides identified using both techniques; however, specific differences were obvious. The nanoLC-MS is about five times more sensitive than the CZE-MS, yet the difference was less pronounced than expected. The CZE-MS technique showed reduced loss of peptides, especially for larger peptides (missed cleavages) and is about four times faster than the nanoLC-MS approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2728
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Barroso MB, 1999, J AM SOC MASS SPECTR, V10, P1271
[2]  
Bateman KP, 1998, J MASS SPECTROM, V33, P1109, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(199811)33:11<1109::AID-JMS728>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-1
[4]   Recent advances in capillary separations for proteomics [J].
Cooper, JW ;
Wang, YJ ;
Lee, CS .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 2004, 25 (23-24) :3913-3926
[5]   Identification of proteins by capillary electrophoresis tandem mass spectrometry - Evaluation of an on-line solid-phase extraction device [J].
Figeys, D ;
Ducret, A ;
Aebersold, R .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1997, 763 (1-2) :295-306
[6]   High sensitivity analysis of proteins and peptides by capillary electrophoresis tandem mass spectrometry: Recent developments in technology and applications [J].
Figeys, D ;
Aebersold, R .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 1998, 19 (06) :885-892
[7]   Electrophoresis combined with novel mass spectrometry techniques: Powerful tools for the analysis of proteins and proteomes [J].
Figeys, D ;
Gygi, SP ;
Zhang, Y ;
Watts, J ;
Gu, M ;
Aebersold, R .
ELECTROPHORESIS, 1998, 19 (10) :1811-1818
[8]   Interfaces for coupled liquid-phase separation/mass spectrometry techniques.: An update on recent developments [J].
Gelpí, E .
JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2002, 37 (03) :241-253
[9]   REDUCED ELUTION SPEED DETECTION FOR CAPILLARY ELECTROPHORESIS MASS-SPECTROMETRY [J].
GOODLETT, DR ;
WAHL, JH ;
UDSETH, HR ;
SMITH, RD .
JOURNAL OF MICROCOLUMN SEPARATIONS, 1993, 5 (01) :57-62
[10]  
Guzman NA, 2001, ELECTROPHORESIS, V22, P3602, DOI 10.1002/1522-2683(200109)22:17<3602::AID-ELPS3602>3.0.CO