Identification and implications of transgraft microleaks after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms

被引:45
作者
Matsumura, JS
Ryu, RK
Ouriel, K
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Div Vasc Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Div Intervent Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Vasc Surg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2001.115383
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this report is to describe an interesting cause of endoleak and detail-specific techniques for identifying small transgraft defects, which we have termed microleaks. Methods. Four patients underwent endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with modular nitinol/polyester endoprostheses and were studied after 6 to 30 months. All patients were enrolled in standard follow-up radiographic surveillance protocols. Results: Three of the four abdominal aortic aneurysms continued to expand after endograft repair. Standard computed tomography imaging with precontrast, dynamic contrast, and delayed imaging frequently identifies endoleak, although it fails to precisely identify microleaks as the source. Color flow duplex ultrasound scan was performed on three patients and perigraft "jets," small areas of color flow adjacent to the endograft, were identified in all. Microleaks were identified in one patient who underwent digital subtraction axteriography with directed efforts to completely opacify the prosthesis lumen and multiple oblique projections. In another patient, contrast arteriography with balloon occlusion of the distal endograft clearly depicted midgraft microleaks that might otherwise be mistaken for graft porosity or cuff junction endoleaks. No microleaks were diagnosed on angiograms when these directed efforts were not performed. Aneurysm exploration before aortic clamping provided conclusive determination of the presence of blood flow through the wall of the endoprosthesis in two patients. Conclusions: Microleaks occur up to 2.5 years after endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms. Although computed tomography demonstrates the presence of an endoleak in these patients, the exact site of origin usually remains obscure. Doppler ultrasound scan and directed arteriography appear to be of greater utility for identifying the presence and location of microleaks. Balloon occlusion arteriography and aneurysm exploration without arterial clamping provide definitive evidence of microleaks. Although the clinical significance of microleaks remains unclear, long-term monitoring of patients is imperative to diagnose and treat these and other modes of endograft failure before they progress to aneurysm rupture.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 197
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abou-Zamzam A M Jr, 1999, Semin Vasc Surg, V12, P235
[2]   Cellular content and permeability of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Adolph, R ;
Vorp, DA ;
Steed, DL ;
Webster, MW ;
Kameneva, MV ;
Watkins, SC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 25 (05) :916-926
[3]   Aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Baum, RA ;
Carpenter, RP ;
Cope, C ;
Golden, MA ;
Velazquez, OC ;
Neschis, DG ;
Mitchell, ME ;
Barker, CF ;
Fairman, RM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (01) :32-40
[4]   Mid-term results of a second generation bifurcated endovascular graft for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The French Vanguard trial [J].
Becquemin, JP ;
Lapie, V ;
Favre, JP ;
Rousseau, H .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 30 (02) :209-218
[5]  
Beebe HG, 2001, J VASC SURG, V33, pS55
[6]  
Böhm T, 1999, AM J ROENTGENOL, V172, P1355
[7]   Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: Comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair [J].
Brewster, DC ;
Geller, SC ;
Kaufman, JA ;
Cambria, RP ;
Gertler, JP ;
LaMuraglia, GM ;
Atamian, S ;
Abbott, WM .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 27 (06) :992-1003
[8]  
Carter KA, 2000, J VASC TECHNOL, V24, P119
[9]  
Harris P, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P11, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0011:LASFEA>2.0.CO
[10]  
2