Estimates of global research productivity in virology

被引:24
作者
Falagas, ME
Karavasiou, AI
Bliziotis, IA
机构
[1] Alfa Inst Biomed Sci, Athens, Greece
[2] Henry Dunant Hosp, Dept Med, Athens, Greece
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
bibliometric analysis; impact factor; global trends; gross domestic product; gross national income; population;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.20346
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The quantity and quality of published research in the field of Virology by different world regions was estimated in this study. Using the PubMed database, articles from journals included in the "Virology" category of the "Journal Citation Reports" database of the Institute for Scientific Information for the period 1995-2003 were retrieved. The world was divided into nine regions based on geographic, economic, and scientific criteria. Data on the country of origin of the research was available for 33,425 out of 33,712 articles (99.2% of all articles from the included journals). USA exceeds all other world regions in research production for the period studied (42% of total articles), with Western Europe ranking second (35.7%). The mean impact factor in articles published in Virology journals was highest for the USA (4.60), while it was 3.90 for Western Europe and 3.22 for the rest of the world (seven regions combined). USA and Canada ranked first in research productivity when both gross national income per capita (GNIPC) and population were taken into account. The results of this analysis show a distressing fact; the absolute and relative production of research in the field of Virology by the developing regions is very low, although viral diseases cause considerable morbidity and mortality in these areas. It is evident from this study that developing regions need more help from the developed regions to enhance research infrastructure. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 233
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, STAT YB
[2]   Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine's scientific contributions [J].
Barnaby, DP ;
Gallagher, EJ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 31 (01) :78-82
[3]   CITATION INDEXES FOR SCIENCE - NEW DIMENSION IN DOCUMENTATION THROUGH ASSOCIATION OF IDEAS [J].
GARFIELD, E .
SCIENCE, 1955, 122 (3159) :108-111
[4]   Representation of authors and editors from countries with different human development indexes in the leading literature on tropical medicine: Survey of current evidence [J].
Keiser, J ;
Utzinger, J ;
Tanner, M ;
Singer, BH .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7450) :1229-1232
[5]   BIBLIOMETRICS AND EVALUATION OF RESEARCH PERFORMANCE [J].
LUUKKONEN, T .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1990, 22 (03) :145-150
[6]   Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991-2001):: A bibliometric evaluation [J].
Ramos, JM ;
Gutiérrez, F ;
Masía, M ;
Martín-Hidalgo, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 23 (03) :180-184
[7]  
Seglen PO, 1997, BRIT MED J, V314, P498
[8]  
VERGIDIS PI, 2005, IN PRESS EUR J CLIN
[9]   Impact factors: facts and myths [J].
Whitehouse, GH .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (04) :715-717
[10]   Biomedical databases and the journal impact factor [J].
Winkmann, G ;
Schweim, HG .
DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2000, 125 (38) :1133-1141