Reporting animal use in scientific papers

被引：34

作者：

Smith, JA

Birke, L ^{[1
]}

Sadler, D

机构：

[1] Univ Warwick, Ctr Study Women & Gender, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England

[2] Inst Med Eth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland

[3] Open Univ, Dept Biol, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England

来源：

LABORATORY ANIMALS | 1997年 / 31卷 / 04期

关键词：

animal experiments; public concern; scientific duality; scientific reporting;

D O I：

10.1258/002367797780596176

中图分类号：

S85 [动物医学（兽医学）];

学科分类号：

0906 ;

摘要：

This paper reports the results of an examination of the 'methods' sections of a range of experimental research papers in biomedical science, focusing on the descriptions of animal use and housing. Detailed descriptions in the methods should enable replication, and also enable readers to judge scientific quality. Relatively few papers sampled gave adequate descriptions of housing conditions and many failed to give details of physiologically relevant: variables such as weight of animals. Thirty per cent of papers omitted the number of animals used, and the deaths of animals (whether as part of the protocol, or accidental death) were not always recorded. Adequate reporting of the conditions of animal maintenance and use are important, both in relation to the quality of the science produced, and also because of public concerns about the ethics of animal experiments.

引用

页码：312 / 317

页数：6