Consistent features in the forelimb representation of primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques

被引:148
作者
Park, MC
Belhaj-Saïf, A
Gordon, M
Cheney, PD
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Mental Retardat Res Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Mol & Integrat Physiol, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Pharmacol, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
[4] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Kansas City, KS 66160 USA
关键词
forelimb; muscles; stimulus-triggered averaging; poststimulus facilitation; EMG; macaque; primary motor cortex;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02784.2001
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to systematically map the forelimb area of primary motor cortex (M1) in rhesus macaques in an effort to investigate further the organization of motor output to distal and proximal muscles. We used stimulus-triggered averaging (StTAing) of electromyographic activity to map the cortical representation of 24 simultaneously recorded forelimb muscles. StTAs were obtained by applying 15 muA stimuli to M1 sites while the monkey performed a reach and prehension task. Motor output to body regions other than the forelimb (e.g., face, trunk, and hindlimb) was identified using repetitive intracortical microstimulation to evoke movements. Detailed, muscle-based maps of M1 revealed a central core of distal (wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand) muscle representation surrounded by a "horseshoe"-shaped zone of proximal (shoulder and elbow) muscle representation. The core distal and proximal zones were separated by a relatively large region representing combinations of both distal and proximal muscles. On the basis of its size and characteristics, we argue that this zone is not simply the result of stimulus-current spread, but rather a distinct zone within the forelimb representation containing cells that specify functional synergies of distal and proximal muscles. Electrode tracks extending medially from the medial arm of the proximal muscle representation evoked trunk and hindlimb responses. No distal or proximal muscle poststimulus effects were found in this region. These results argue against the existence of a second, major noncontiguous distal or proximal forelimb representation located medially within the macaque M1 representation.
引用
收藏
页码:2784 / 2792
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   CROSS-CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF INTERNEURONAL CONNECTIVITY IN THE MOTOR CORTEX OF THE MONKEY [J].
ALLUM, JHJ ;
HEPPREYMOND, MC ;
GYSIN, R .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1982, 231 (02) :325-334
[2]   TOPOGRAPHICAL ORGANIZATION OF CORTICAL EFFERENT ZONES PROJECTING TO DISTAL FORELIMB MUSCLES IN MONKEY [J].
ASANUMA, H ;
ROSEN, I .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1972, 14 (03) :243-+
[3]   FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION OF A CORTICAL EFFERENT SYSTEM EXAMINED WITH FOCAL DEPTH STIMULATION IN CATS [J].
ASANUMA, H ;
SAKATA, H .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1967, 30 (01) :35-&
[4]   An investigation of the intrinsic circuitry of the motor cortex of the monkey using intra-cortical microstimulation [J].
Baker, SN ;
Olivier, E ;
Lemon, RN .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 123 (04) :397-411
[5]   Distribution and characteristics of poststimulus effects in proximal and distal forelimb muscles from red nucleus in the monkey [J].
Belhaj-Saïf, A ;
Karrer, JH ;
Cheney, PD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 79 (04) :1777-1789
[6]  
Cheney Paul D., 1996, P277
[7]   COMPARABLE PATTERNS OF MUSCLE FACILITATION EVOKED BY INDIVIDUAL CORTICOMOTONEURONAL (CM) CELLS AND BY SINGLE INTRACORTICAL MICROSTIMULI IN PRIMATES - EVIDENCE FOR FUNCTIONAL-GROUPS OF CM CELLS [J].
CHENEY, PD ;
FETZ, EE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 53 (03) :786-804
[8]   POSTSPIKE FACILITATION OF FORELIMB MUSCLE-ACTIVITY BY PRIMATE CORTICOMOTONEURONAL CELLS [J].
FETZ, EE ;
CHENEY, PD .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 44 (04) :751-772
[9]  
FETZ EE, 1990, CEREB CORTEX, V9, P1
[10]   THE RELATIONSHIP OF CORPUS-CALLOSUM CONNECTIONS TO ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION MAPS OF MOTOR, SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR, AND THE FRONTAL EYE FIELDS IN OWL MONKEYS [J].
GOULD, HJ ;
CUSICK, CG ;
PONS, TP ;
KAAS, JH .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1986, 247 (03) :297-325