Stand structure as the basis of diversity index

被引:67
作者
Lähde, E [1 ]
Laiho, O [1 ]
Norokorpi, Y [1 ]
Saksa, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Forest Res Inst, FIN-01301 Vantaa, Finland
关键词
within-stand diversity; between-stand diversity; boreal forest; stem distribution;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00400-9
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Abundance of tree species and variation in tree size, age and genetic composition are the most relevant components of diversity in a forest stand. The aim of this study was to develop a within-stand diversity index and classification for between-stand diversity to meet these requirements. This, what may be called LLNS diversity index, was assessed by using the following indicator variables: stem distribution of live trees by tree species (stems ha(-1)), standing and fallen dead trees by tree species (m(3) ha(-1)), occurrence of special trees (number/significance) and charred wood (m(3) ha(-1)). The index was introduced as a scoring table for field use and as a mathematical formula for research and computerisation use. In the test material, this index served to differentiate the development classes of forest stands and site-types fairly well. The value of the index was at its highest in unmanaged, old-growth stands dominated by Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). In single-tree selection stands, regularly all-sized stand structure resulted in a high diversity index values whereas low thinning, by evening out stand structure, reduced diversity. Classification of between-stand diversity was based on within-stand diversity scores, which were allocated to four quality levels (Excellent, Good, Satisfactory, Poor) by site-type. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 220
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER RR, 1986, RM128 USDA FOR SERV
[2]   THREATENED PLANT, ANIMAL, AND FUNGUS SPECIES IN SWEDISH FORESTS - DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS [J].
BERG, A ;
EHNSTROM, B ;
GUSTAFSSON, L ;
HALLINGBACK, T ;
JONSELL, M ;
WESLIEN, J .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 8 (03) :718-731
[3]  
BRUSCHEL P, 1987, GRUNDRISS WALDBAUS L
[4]  
BUONGIORNO J, 1994, FOREST SCI, V40, P83
[5]  
Elliott C.A., 1990, WILDLIFE FORESTS FOR, P297
[6]  
FRANZREB KE, 1978, WILSON BULL, V90, P221
[7]   A MATHEMATICAL-PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR MAINTAINING STRUCTURAL DIVERSITY IN UNEVEN-AGED FOREST STANDS WITH IMPLICATIONS TO OTHER FORMULATIONS [J].
GOVE, JH ;
PATIL, GP ;
TAILLIE, C .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1995, 79 (1-3) :11-19
[8]   BRYOPHYTE FLORA AND VEGETATION OF MANAGED AND VIRGIN CONIFEROUS FORESTS IN SOUTHWEST SWEDEN [J].
GUSTAFSSON, L ;
HALLINGBACK, T .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1988, 44 (04) :283-300
[9]  
Hering K. G., 1993, Forstarchiv, V64, P284
[10]  
HUNTER ML, 1990, WILDLIFE FORESTS FOR