Ethanol-conditioned place preference is reduced in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice

被引:103
作者
Cunningham, CL
Howard, MA
Gill, SJ
Rubinstein, M
Low, MJ
Grandy, DK
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Behav Neurosci, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Physiol & Pharmacol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Cell & Dev Biol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Vollum Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland Alcohol Res Ctr, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[6] CONICET, Inst Invest Ingn Genet & Biol Mol, RA-1033 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[7] Univ Buenos Aires, Dept Biol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
ethanol; conditioned place preference; locomotor activity; dopamine D2 receptor; knockout mice; C57BL/6xDBA/2 F2 hybrid mice;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00414-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Pharmacological blockade studies have supported a role of the dopamine system in ethanol reward for many years, but receptor subtype specificity has been difficult to establish. Recently, genetically engineered mice lacking functional dopamine D2 receptors have been shown to drink less ethanol in a two-bottle choice task. To determine whether reduced ethanol intake reflects a reduction in ethanol reward, D2 receptor-deficient [knockout (KO)] mice were compared to heterozygous (HET) and wild-type (WT; C57BL/6 x DBA/2 F2 hybrid) mice in a place conditioning task. Under conditions that produced reliable place preference in both WT and HET mice, KO mice showed no evidence of place conditioning, suggesting that D2 receptor gene inactivation reduced ethanol reward or the ability to learn about ethanol reward. Consistent with previous findings, this mutation also produced a gene dose-related reduction in basal activity levels. Moreover, KO and HET mice showed enhancement of ethanol-stimulated activity relative to WT mice. However, differences in basal and ethanol-stimulated activity did not explain the differences in place conditioning. Overall, this study strongly supports the conclusion that dopamine D2 receptors normally influence ethanol reward in mice. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
BALK JH, 1995, NATURE, V377, P424
[2]   Neuropharmacological mechanisms of drug reward: Beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens [J].
Bardo, MT .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (1-2) :37-67
[3]   GABAA receptors modulate ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and taste aversion in mice [J].
Chester, JA ;
Cunningham, CL .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 144 (04) :363-372
[4]   Ethanol reward and aversion in mice bred for sensitivity to ethanol withdrawal [J].
Chester, JA ;
Risinger, FO ;
Cunningham, CL .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 22 (02) :468-473
[5]   Baclofen alters ethanol-stimulated activity but not conditioned place preference or taste aversion in mice [J].
Chester, JA ;
Cunningham, CL .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 63 (02) :325-331
[6]   BIPHASIC EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON OPEN-FIELD ACTIVITY - SENSITIVITY AND TOLERANCE IN C57BL/6N AND DBA/2N MICE [J].
CRABBE, JC ;
JOHNSON, NA ;
GRAY, DK ;
KOSOBUD, A ;
YOUNG, ER .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 96 (03) :440-451
[7]  
Cunningham C.L., 1993, METHODS BEHAV PHARM, P349, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-81444-9.50019-5
[8]   Naloxone Facilitates Extinction but Does Not Affect Acquisition or Expression of Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference [J].
Cunningham, Christopher L. ;
Dickinson, Shelly D. ;
Okorn, Dobrina M. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 3 (04) :330-343
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF ETHANOLS HEDONIC EFFECTS IN MICE SELECTIVELY BRED FOR SENSITIVITY TO ETHANOL-INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA [J].
CUNNINGHAM, CL ;
HALLETT, CL ;
NIEHUS, DR ;
HUNTER, JS ;
NOUTH, L ;
RISINGER, FO .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 105 (01) :84-92
[10]   GENETIC-DIFFERENCES IN THE REWARDING AND ACTIVATING EFFECTS OF MORPHINE AND ETHANOL [J].
CUNNINGHAM, CL ;
NIEHUS, DR ;
MALOTT, DH ;
PRATHER, LK .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 107 (2-3) :385-393