Mammography screening in elderly women: efficacy and cost-effectiveness

被引:12
作者
Zappa, M [1 ]
Visioli, CB [1 ]
Ciatto, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Sci Inst Tuscany Reg, Ctr Study & Prevent Canc, CSPO, Descript & Epidemiol Unit, I-50135 Florence, Italy
关键词
mass screening; mammography; cost-effectiveness analysis; aged; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1016/S1040-8428(03)00022-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The definition of an upper age limit for breast cancer screening is a rather complex issue, influenced by several conditions. Randomised trials specifically designed to investigate this aspect are not available, but all process indicators (positive predictive value, length of sojourn time, sensitivity of the test) indicate that screening efficacy does not change with increasing age. On the other hand, competing causes of death could decrease screening efficacy beyond age 74. Screening benefits depend on life expectancy and people with < 5-10 years life expectancy are unlikely to benefit from screening, so it is still worthwhile considering the variability of life expectancy at different ages. Furthermore, economical implications are evident. Public health recommendations need to weigh the benefit of screening elderly women against costs, negative side effects and potential harm due to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of screen-detected lesions expected to have no effect on mortality. In this scenario, the medical system has an ethical obligation to properly inform the population invited to screening. Over the age of 74 years, encouraging individualized decisions may be more appropriate and may indicate further screening for those subjects for whom the potential benefit outweighs the potential negative effects. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 239
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review [J].
Barratt, AL ;
Irwig, LM ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Salkeld, GP ;
Houssami, N .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (06) :266-271
[2]  
Boer R, 1999, CANCER, V86, P1506, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1506::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]   In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening [J].
Boer, R ;
deKoning, HJ ;
vanOortmarssen, GJ ;
van der Maas, PJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (12) :2040-2043
[5]   SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
EDDY, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (05) :389-399
[6]   REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
FLETCHER, SW ;
BLACK, W ;
HARRIS, R ;
RIMER, BK ;
SHAPIRO, S .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (20) :1644-1656
[7]   Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? [J].
Gotzsche, PC ;
Olsen, O .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9198) :129-134
[8]   Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years - Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness [J].
Kerlikowske, K ;
Salzmann, P ;
Phillips, KA ;
Cauley, JA ;
Cummings, SR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (22) :2156-2163
[9]   POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY BY AGE AND FAMILY HISTORY OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
KERLIKOWSKE, K ;
GRADY, D ;
BARCLAY, J ;
SICKLES, EA ;
EATON, A ;
ERNSTER, V .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (20) :2444-2450
[10]   BREAST-CANCER SCREENING FOR ELDERLY WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT COMORBID CONDITIONS - A DECISION-ANALYSIS MODEL [J].
MANDELBLATT, JS ;
WHEAT, ME ;
MONANE, M ;
MOSHIEF, RD ;
HOLLENBERG, JP ;
TANG, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 116 (09) :722-730