Measuring the severity of upper gastrointestinal complaints: does GP assessment correspond with patients' self-assessment?

被引:9
作者
Fransen, G. A. J.
Janssen, M. J. R.
Muris, J. W. M.
Mesters, I.
Knottnerus, J. A.
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Caphri Res Inst, Dept Gen Practice, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Caphri Res Inst, Dept Hlth Promot & Hlth Educ, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
agreement; dyspepsia; family medicine; gastroenterology; questionnaire;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmm011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Questionnaires are frequently used to measure the severity of gastrointestinal (GI) complaints. These questionnaires can either be filled out by the physicians or by the patients, but it is not clear whether these scores correspond. This study aimed to investigate the interrater agreement between physician-reported severity and patient-reported severity concerning the patients' upper GI complaints. Methods. In a prospective observational study, the severity of eight GI complaints was registered by both patients and GPs independently on a seven-point scale (n = 316) before and after treatment with esomeprazole. Weighted kappa values for the agreement on the severity and simple kappa values for the agreement on the absence or presence of symptoms were calculated. Results. The weighted kappa values ranged from 0.14 to 0.68 indicating poor to moderate agreement. The agreement on the presence or absence of symptoms was similar. Several systematic differences in scoring were found: the GPs tended to underestimate the severity of belching, nausea, early satiety, vomiting and upper and lower abdominal pain. Furthermore, the treatment effect for belching and lower abdominal pain was more often overestimated, while the treatment effect for nausea was more often underestimated by the GP. Conclusion. The agreement between GP and patient is low. The differences in scoring should be kept in mind when comparing physician-reported outcomes with patient-reported outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Evaluation of a gastrointestinal symptoms questionnaire [J].
Bovenschen, H. J. ;
Janssen, M. J. R. ;
van Oijen, M. G. H. ;
Laheij, R. J. F. ;
van Rossum, L. G. M. ;
Jansen, J. B. M. J. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (09) :1509-1515
[2]   Assessment of reflux symptom severity: methodological options and their attributes [J].
Bytzer, P .
GUT, 2004, 53 :28-34
[3]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .2. RESOLVING THE PARADOXES [J].
CICCHETTI, DV ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :551-558
[4]  
FRANSEN GAJ, 2004, GUT S4, V53, pA284
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[6]   Assessing symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: How well do clinicians' assessments agree with those of their patients? [J].
McColl, E ;
Junghard, O ;
Wiklund, I ;
Revicki, DA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 100 (01) :11-18
[7]   Development and validation of the Diabetes Bowel Symptom Questionnaire [J].
Quan, C ;
Talley, NJ ;
Cross, S ;
Jones, M ;
Hammer, J ;
Giles, N ;
Horowitz, M .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 17 (09) :1179-1187
[8]  
Revicki DA, 1998, QUAL LIFE RES, V7, P75
[9]   OMEPRAZOLE OR RANITIDINE IN THE TREATMENT OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, SCANDINAVIAN MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
SANDMARK, S ;
CARLSSON, R ;
FAUSA, O ;
LUNDELL, L .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 23 (05) :625-632
[10]  
van Zanten SV, 2003, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V98, P1963, DOI [10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07583.x, 10.1016/S0002-9270(03)00432-5]