A systematic review of the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an addition to mammography and ultrasound in screening young women at high risk of breast cancer

被引:236
作者
Lord, S. J.
Lei, W.
Craft, P.
Cawson, J. N.
Morris, I.
Walleser, S.
Griffiths, A.
Parker, S.
Houssami, N.
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Natl Hlth & Med Res Council Clin Trials Ctr, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Canberra Hosp, Med Oncol Unit, Woden, ACT 2605, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Med, Acad Unit Internal Med, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, St Vincent Hosp, Melbourne, Vic 3065, Australia
[5] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Princess Margaret Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; breast neoplasms; mass screening; sensitivity and specificity; BRCA1; protein; BRCA2;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2007.06.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an additional screening test for young women at high risk of breast cancer in whom mammography alone has poor sensitivity. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness of adding MRI to mammography with or without breast ultrasound and clinical breast examination (CBE) in screening this population. We found consistent evidence in 5 studies that adding MRI provides a highly sensitive screening strategy (sensitivity range: 93-100%) compared to mammography alone (25-59%) or mammography plus ultrasound +/- CBE (49-67%). Meta-analysis of the three studies that compared MRI plus mammography versus mammography alone showed the sensitivity of MRI plus mammography as 94% (95%CI 86-98%) and the incremental sensitivity of MRI as 58% (95%CI 47-70%). Incremental sensitivity of MRI was lower when added to mammography plus ultrasound (44%, 95%CI 27-61%) or to the combination of mammography, ultrasound plus CBE (31-33%). Estimates of screening specificity with MRI were less consistent but suggested a 3-5-fold higher risk of patient recall for investigation of false positive results. No studies assessed as to whether adding MRI reduces patient mortality, interval or advanced breast cancer rates, and we did not find strong evidence that MRI leads to the detection of earlier stage disease. Conclusions about the effectiveness of MRI therefore depend on assumptions about the benefits of early detection from trials of mammographic screening in older average risk populations. The extent to which high risk younger women receive the same benefits from early detection and treatment of MRI-detected cancers has not yet been established. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1905 / 1917
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
[Anonymous], SYSTEMATIC REV HLTH
[2]
Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[3]
Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[4]
Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[5]
Cuzick J, 2002, LANCET, V360, P817
[6]
The mammographic screening trials:: Commentary on the recent work by Olsen and Gotzsche [J].
Duffy, SW ;
Tabár, L ;
Smith, RA .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2002, 52 (02) :68-71
[7]
Screening mammography: Do women prefer a higher recall rate given the possibility of earlier detection of cancer? [J].
Ganott, MA ;
Sumkin, JH ;
King, JL ;
Klym, AH ;
Catullo, VJ ;
Cohen, CS ;
Gur, D .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (03) :793-800
[8]
Breast imaging findings in women with BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinoma [J].
Hamilton, LJ ;
Evans, AJ ;
Wilson, ARM ;
Scott, N ;
Cornford, EJ ;
Pinder, SE ;
Khan, HN ;
Macmillan, RD .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (10) :895-902
[9]
Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer [J].
Hartmann, LC ;
Schaid, DJ ;
Woods, JE ;
Crotty, TP ;
Myers, JL ;
Arnold, PG ;
Petty, PM ;
Sellers, TA ;
Johnson, JL ;
McDonnell, SK ;
Frost, MH ;
Jenkins, RB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (02) :77-84
[10]
Should women at high risk of breast cancer have screening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Wilson, Robin .
BREAST, 2007, 16 (01) :2-4