Better methods for solving parsimony and compatibility

被引:10
作者
Bonet, M
Steel, M
Warnow, T
Yooseph, S
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Catalunya, Dept Lenguages & Sist Informat, ES-08034 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Canterbury, Biomath Res Ctr, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
[3] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, DIMACS, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/cmb.1998.5.391
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Evolutionary tree reconstruction is a challenging problem with important applications in biology and linguistics, In biology, one of the most promising approaches to tree reconstruction is to find the "maximum parsimony" tree, while in linguistics, the use of the "maximum compatibility" method has been very useful. However, these problems are NP-hard, and current approaches to solving these problems amount to heuristic searches through the space of possible tree topologies (a search which can, on large trees, take months to complete), In this paper, we present a new technique, Optimal Tree Refinement, for reconstructing very large trees. Our technique is motivated by recent experimental studies which have shown that certain polynomial time methods often return contractions of the true tree. We study the use of this technique in solving maximum parsimony and maximum compatibility, and present both hardness results and polynomial time algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 407
页数:17
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A POLYNOMIAL-TIME ALGORITHM FOR THE PERFECT PHYLOGENY PROBLEM WHEN THE NUMBER OF CHARACTER STATES IS FIXED [J].
AGARWALA, R ;
FERNANDEZBACA, D .
SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 1994, 23 (06) :1216-1224
[2]  
Arora S., 1992, P 33 IEEE S FDN COMP, P13
[3]  
ATTESON K, 1997, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, V1276, P101
[4]   Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters [J].
Chang, JT .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1996, 134 (02) :189-215
[6]   COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY OF INFERRING PHYLOGENIES BY COMPATIBILITY [J].
DAY, WHE ;
SANKOFF, D .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1986, 35 (02) :224-229
[7]  
Farach M., 1996, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, P230, DOI 10.1145/237814.237868
[8]   CASES IN WHICH PARSIMONY OR COMPATIBILITY METHODS WILL BE POSITIVELY MISLEADING [J].
FELSENSTEIN, J .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1978, 27 (04) :401-410
[9]   TOWARD DEFINING COURSE OF EVOLUTION - MINIMUM CHANGE FOR A SPECIFIC TREE TOPOLOGY [J].
FITCH, WM .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1971, 20 (04) :406-&
[10]  
Foulds L.R., 1982, ADV APPL MATH, V3, P43, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0196-8858(82)80004-3