Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification

被引:85
作者
Papadimitriou, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessaly, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Volos 38334, Greece
关键词
structural identification; experimental design; information entropy; sensor placement; pareto optima;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2004.06.043
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Theoretical and computational issues arising in the selection of the optimal sensor configuration for parameter estimation in structural dynamics are addressed. The objective is to optimally locate sensors in the structure such that the resulting measured data are most informative for estimating the parameters of a family of mathematical model classes used for structural modeling. For a single model class, the information entropy is used as the optimality criterion for selecting the best sensor configuration. For multiple model classes, the problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem of finding the Pareto optimal sensor configurations that simultaneously minimize appropriately defined information entropy indices. A heuristic algorithm is proposed for constructing effective Pareto optimal sensor configurations that are superior, in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy, to the Pareto sensor configurations predicted by evolutionary algorithms suitable for solving general multi-objective optimisation problems. The theoretical developments and the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms are illustrated for a 10-DOF chain-like spring mass model and a 32-DOF truss structure. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1655 / 1673
页数:19
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Placement of sensors/actuators on civil structures using genetic algorithms [J].
Abdullah, MM ;
Richardson, A ;
Hanif, J .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2001, 30 (08) :1167-1184
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, GENETIC ALGORITHM SE
[3]   Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework [J].
Beck, JL ;
Katafygiotis, LS .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 1998, 124 (04) :455-461
[4]   Model selection using response measurements: Bayesian probabilistic approach [J].
Beck, JL ;
Yuen, KV .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2004, 130 (02) :192-203
[5]  
Bedrossian H, 2003, COMPUTATIONAL STOCHASTIC MECHANICS, P53
[6]  
BLEISTEIN N, 1986, ASYMPTOTIC EXPANSION
[7]   Finite element model tuning using automated structural optimization system software [J].
Cobb, RG ;
Canfield, RA ;
Liebst, BS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1996, 34 (02) :392-399
[8]   An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization [J].
Fonseca, Carlos M. ;
Fleming, Peter J. .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 1995, 3 (01) :1-16
[9]  
HEMEZ PM, 1994, 12 INT MOD AN C IMAC, P1568
[10]  
Heredia-Zavoni E, 1998, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V27, P343, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199804)27:4<343::AID-EQE726>3.0.CO